Category: Claims and disputes · Reviewed by the Apex broking team · Last reviewed 2026-08-21
Category: Claims and disputes Also known as: coverage dispute, declaratory proceedings, coverage action Related concepts: reservation of rights, interim payments
Coverage litigation resolves a question of contract: does this policy, on these facts, respond to this loss? Typical issues include whether the claim falls within the insuring clause, whether an exclusion applies, whether notification was valid and in time, whether a condition precedent was complied with, whether the risk was fairly presented, and how the limit or excess applies to a set of related events.
None of that is the same question as whether the policyholder is liable to the third party, or how much the fire actually cost. Those are questions in the underlying claim. Keeping the two apart is the organising principle of UK coverage practice.
Most coverage disputes begin not with proceedings but with a reservation of rights. Where an insurer sees a potential coverage problem but is not yet in a position to decide, it will continue to deal with the claim while reserving its position, so that its conduct is not later said to have waived the point or created an estoppel.
A reservation is not a declinature and it is not neutral. It tells the policyholder that cover is in doubt, it usually identifies the grounds, and it starts the clock on practical decisions: whether to fund defence costs, whether to appoint separate coverage counsel, and whether to press for a decision. A reservation that is vague, or that is maintained indefinitely without a decision, is itself a point to challenge.
The characteristic remedy in a coverage action is a declaration. The court declares the parties’ rights under the policy — that the insurer is liable to indemnify, or that it is not, or that a particular exclusion does or does not apply — rather than, or as well as, awarding a sum of money.
Either side can seek it. An insurer may bring proceedings for a declaration that it is not liable, which forces the question and prevents the policyholder from leaving the issue unresolved. A policyholder may seek a declaration that the policy responds, which is often more useful than a claim for damages while the underlying loss is still unquantified. Where the insured has become insolvent, a third party with a claim against it may proceed directly against the insurer under the Third Parties (Rights against Insurers) Act 2010 and have coverage determined in those proceedings. If a complaint or dispute has already landed, notify us.
Separately, section 13A of the Insurance Act 2015 implies a term that an insurer must pay sums due within a reasonable time, with damages available for breach. That is a claim about delay rather than about coverage, but it frequently travels alongside a coverage dispute.
The separation is deliberate and rests on several practical reasons.
The consequence is that a policyholder facing both may be running two sets of proceedings at once, sometimes with different legal teams, and must manage what is said in one so as not to damage the other.
It is a court declaration of the parties’ rights under the policy — for example that an exclusion does not apply, or that the insurer is not liable to indemnify. It resolves the coverage question without necessarily awarding a sum of money.
No. It means the insurer has identified a potential coverage issue and is preserving its position while it continues to deal with the claim, so that its conduct is not treated as a waiver. It should set out the grounds, and it should not be left open indefinitely.
Because the parties and the issues differ, and because arguing coverage in the same proceedings risks exposing privileged material about your own liability to your opponent and prejudicing the defence of the underlying claim.
Section 13A of the Insurance Act 2015 implies a term that sums due must be paid within a reasonable time, and damages can be awarded for breach. What is reasonable depends on the circumstances, and an insurer investigating a genuinely doubtful claim is not automatically in breach.
This entry is part of the Apex Insurance Wiki. Last reviewed 2026-08-21. Next review: 2027-02-21.
Apex Insurance Brokers Limited. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority, FRN 724952. Registered in England and Wales, Companies House 07014570. This entry provides general information about UK insurance concepts and is not regulated advice. Consult your insurance broker on your specific position.
Apex Insurance Brokers serves UK professional services firms and commercial businesses. Call 0117 325 0027, email info@apexinsurancebrokers.co.uk, or request a quotation.
Get a quote