REDD+ insurance

Category: Carbon market insurance · Reviewed by Chrissie Anderson, Client Executive · Last reviewed 2026-06-10

REDD+ insurance is a class of specialist cover that protects participants in Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) projects and jurisdictional programmes — and the carbon credits they generate — against reversal, methodology revision, registry invalidation and political risk in the host jurisdiction.

Category: Carbon market insurance Also known as: REDD insurance, Avoided deforestation insurance, Jurisdictional REDD+ insurance Typical UK market form: Specie / political risk hybrid with parametric reversal triggers Related concepts: Sequestration insurance, Voluntary carbon market insurance, Reforestation insurance

Definition

REDD+ insurance is the cover that responds to the principal financial risks affecting REDD+ activities. “REDD+” denotes the framework for reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation and the role of conservation, sustainable management of forests and enhancement of forest carbon stocks in developing countries, as set out under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).

The product addresses projects (private, voluntary-market) and jurisdictional programmes (state-level, increasingly aligned with Article 6 of the Paris Agreement) and the credits each issues. It is one of the most complex carbon-insurance products because it combines biological reversal risk, methodology and integrity risk, host-state political risk and the evolving Article 6 transactional architecture.

Underlying carbon market structure

The REDD+ framework arises from UNFCCC Decision 1/CP.16, the Cancun Agreements (December 2010), which established the activities eligible for REDD+, and from the Warsaw REDD+ Framework, Decisions 9 to 15/CP.19 (November 2013), which set the methodological and financial architecture. Article 6 of the Paris Agreement (December 2015) and the Glasgow Rulebook adopted at COP26 (November 2021) provide the cooperative-implementation architecture under which REDD+ outcomes may be transferred internationally as Internationally Transferred Mitigation Outcomes (ITMOs).

In the voluntary market, REDD+ credits are issued principally under Verra (Verified Carbon Standard v4.7) and the American Carbon Registry. Verra’s methodology overhaul through 2023 — moving towards a jurisdictional baseline approach — substantially revised the issuance basis for project-scale REDD+ and was a material market event. The Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Market published its Core Carbon Principles, Assessment Framework and Assessment Procedure on 29 March 2023, with REDD methodologies being assessed against it. The Voluntary Carbon Markets Integrity Initiative Claims Code of Practice (28 June 2023; v2 November 2024) shapes the demand-side claims that buyers may make against REDD+ credits.

Insurance coverage

REDD+ insurance typically covers four families of peril. Reversal cover responds to fire, illegal logging, land conversion and political disturbance affecting the project area. Invalidation cover responds where the registry administrator removes credits following methodology revision (a material risk in REDD+ given the 2023 Verra methodology revision) or sanction of the project developer. Political risk cover responds to host-state action — expropriation, change of law affecting the project, export restriction, and frustration of fiscal incentives. Fraud and double-counting cover responds to identified integrity failures.

Specialist underwriters writing in this space include Kita Earth (Lloyd’s Lab Cohort 7, March 2022), CFC Underwriting (carbon credit invalidation product launched April 2023), Howden’s dedicated carbon insurance practice and Oka (founded 2023, Beazley Smart Tracker), alongside specialist political risk underwriters in the London market and treaty reinsurers in continental Europe. Some programmes carry parametric reversal triggers calibrated to satellite-observed forest cover loss across the project area, allowing rapid payment without lengthy individual loss assessment.

Cover periods are aligned with the methodology’s verification cycle, with renewable structures the market norm given the long permanence horizons.

UK regulatory framework

REDD+ engagement by United Kingdom corporates is principally through the Voluntary Carbon Market and through Article 6 ITMOs. The UK Emissions Trading Scheme, established by the Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading Scheme Order 2020 (SI 2020/1265), does not currently accept REDD+ credits for compliance.

The Financial Conduct Authority’s Perimeter Guidance Manual at PERG 13 governs the question whether REDD+ credits are MiFID financial instruments, and FCA Discussion Paper DP23/3 considered the broader perimeter. Where REDD+ credits are used to support buyer claims, the Competition and Markets Authority Green Claims Code (20 September 2021) is enforced by the Advertising Standards Authority — the rulings against Lufthansa (December 2023) and Etihad (October 2022) illustrate the direction of travel and the materiality of avoided-emissions credits within those rulings.

The FCA’s anti-greenwashing rule (Policy Statement PS23/16, November 2023, in force 31 May 2024) applies to FCA-authorised firms communicating sustainability characteristics, including those reliant on REDD+ credits.

Insurance market capacity

Per-risk capacity for REDD+ projects in the London market is generally in the low to mid tens of millions of pounds per project, with co-insurance and excess layers common for larger jurisdictional programmes. Capacity tightened materially through 2023 and 2024 following the Verra methodology revision and the resulting market repricing, but new entrants and parametric structures have progressively expanded the available envelope.

Example

A UK financial group commits long-term funding to a jurisdictional REDD+ programme in a Latin American host state, with credits to be issued under a recognised standard and aligned with the host state’s Article 6 strategy. Its broker places REDD+ insurance combining reversal cover with a parametric satellite-observed forest loss trigger, invalidation cover at the registry level, and political risk cover responding to host-state action — structured to maintain the integrity of the credits the group will subsequently retire against its disclosed transition plan.

See also

References

  1. UNFCCC Decision 1/CP.16 “Cancun Agreements” (December 2010); Warsaw REDD+ Framework, Decisions 9 to 15/CP.19 (November 2013).
  2. Article 6 Paris Agreement (December 2015) and Glasgow Rulebook (COP26, November 2021).
  3. Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Market, Core Carbon Principles, Assessment Framework and Assessment Procedure (29 March 2023).

This entry is part of the Apex Insurance Wiki. Last reviewed by Matt Bartlett on 2026-06-10. Next review: 2026-12-10.

Apex Insurance Brokers Limited. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority, FRN 724952. Registered in England and Wales, Companies House 07014570. This entry provides general information about UK insurance concepts and is not regulated advice. Consult your insurance broker on your specific position.

Talk to a specialist broker

Apex Insurance Brokers serves UK professional services firms and commercial businesses. Call 0117 325 0027, email hello@apexinsurancebrokers.co.uk, or request a quotation.

Get a quote
Our service promise. We acknowledge every quote request the same working day. For straightforward risks, indicative terms typically follow within five working days. Complex risks — higher-risk buildings, cladding, mid-term proposals requiring fresh underwriting — may take longer; we’ll send you a progress note by the end of the fifth working day in those cases.
★ 4.0 on Trustpilot (verified)|Listed on the ARB PI broker list|FCA FRN 724952