Aipedia: Architects
Architects may use AI chatbots and AI-written marketing, but everything they say about the practice must be accurate, and chatbot answers may be treated as the practice's own advice. Marketing claims are a regulatory issue as well as a liability one.
Part of: AI in Architects
In short
Architects Code Standard 1.2 requires architects to promote their services responsibly and accurately, and RIBA's Code bans misleading statements about qualifications or resources and misleading words or images. AI-written web copy can overstate experience, and AI-generated project images can show work the practice never did. A website chatbot that answers questions about planning, costs or building regulations may be relied on by a prospective client. Whether PI responds depends on the wording, and some exposures sit under cyber or other covers.
Practices use generative tools to write website pages, case studies, award entries, social media posts and bid documents, and to produce concept images for marketing. Some add a chatbot to their website to answer enquiries, qualify leads and explain services. Others use AI to draft responses to tender questionnaires.
These tools write persuasively and fill gaps with plausible claims. A chatbot will answer whatever it is asked, including questions about planning prospects, build costs or whether an extension needs building regulations approval. It answers in the practice's name and branding, so a visitor has little reason to doubt it. Unless someone reviews the transcripts, the practice may not know what has been said on its behalf.
The ARB and RIBA guide covers the Code more fully.
Illustrative scenario. A homeowner asks a practice's website chatbot whether a two-storey rear extension can be built without planning permission. The chatbot says it falls within permitted development. The homeowner relies on the answer, appoints a builder directly and later receives an enforcement notice. The homeowner says the practice gave negligent advice through its website.
Other problems include AI-written case studies that overstate the practice's role on a project, AI images of buildings that do not exist presented as portfolio work, and chatbots that collect personal data without proper notices. AI imagery risks are covered further in AI renders and visualisations, and image ownership in generative design and copyright.
Exposures from chatbots and marketing do not all sit in one policy:
See AI chatbot insurance for a general overview of chatbot exposures.
Back to the AI in architecture overview.
Apex arranges PI and cyber insurance for architects. A broker can check how your policies would treat a claim arising from a website chatbot or marketing material.
It may. If a prospective client relies on a chatbot answer about planning or regulations and suffers loss, they may argue the practice gave negligent advice. Disclaimers help but may not settle the point, so restricting what the chatbot answers is safer.
Only if they are clearly labelled and not presented as completed work. Standard 1.2 requires accurate promotion and the RIBA Code bans misleading images. Showing AI concepts as built projects risks a regulatory complaint and misleads clients.
Possibly, for negligent advice claims, depending on the wording and whether the policy covers advice given before an appointment. Data breaches through the chatbot are usually a cyber insurance matter. Ask your broker to check both policies.
Yes. Telling users they are talking to an automated tool, and that answers are general information rather than professional advice, helps manage expectations under Standard 5.3 and reduces reliance arguments.
Tell us about your firm and the work you do. A broker will review how your current PI treats AI-assisted work, or arrange new cover. No fee for a quote. Or call 0117 325 0027.
Start a PI quote Request a callbackApex Insurance Brokers Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Registered in England and Wales, company number 07014570. This page is general information about how AI is used in the profession and how insurance may respond. It is not legal, regulatory or insurance advice on your circumstances, and it does not guarantee that cover will be available or on what terms.