Aipedia: Energy assessors and retrofit coordinators
AI tools can help explain the reformed EPC, but many still reflect the old single rating, so assessors must check outputs against the new metrics. Landlords and sellers are making decisions now, and advice based on the old framework can cost them money.
Part of: AI in energy assessors and retrofit coordinators
In short
MHCLG's January 2026 partial response introduces new domestic EPC headline metrics (energy cost, fabric performance, heating system and smart readiness), keeps 10-year validity, requires a valid EPC at marketing and removes the heritage exemption. Government aimed to deliver new EPCs from October 2026. AI tools trained on older material may apply the old rating, mix up metrics or treat estimates as ratings. Date communications, separate information from advice and check outputs against the official material. Mis-advice claims are usually treated as negligence under PI.
Clients are asking what the reformed EPC means for them, and assessors and consultants are turning to AI tools to draft explainers, client letters and FAQ answers. Some software providers are also adding AI features that predict how a property will score under the new metrics.
The difficulty is timing. Much of the material an AI tool has learned from describes the old single rating. Unless the tool is carefully configured, it may answer questions about the new EPC using the old framework.
MHCLG's partial government response on EPC reform was published on 21 January 2026 and updated on 9 March 2026. The points clients most often need explained are:
Government said it was "working hard to deliver new EPCs from October 2026" and called the timeline "ambitious". Check the current launch position with your scheme before telling clients which EPC they will receive. The methodology is being developed through the Home Energy Model (HEM) consultation on existing dwellings and new EPC metrics. The response commits only to ensuring schemes and assessors are "equipped"; it sets out no change to accreditation or PI and does not mention AI.
Reg 24(1) of the EPB Regulations 2012 continues to require reasonable care and skill in assessments.
During a transition, the risk is less about bad maths and more about the wrong framework. Typical errors are:
Illustrative: an assessor sends landlord clients an AI-drafted newsletter saying that a property already rated C will not need further work. Under the new metrics, several of those properties fall short on fabric performance. Landlords delay works, then face higher costs and a compressed timetable. One alleges the newsletter was advice and claims for the extra cost.
Whether a general explainer creates a duty depends on the circumstances, but personalised advice to a client usually does. Claims arising from mis-advice about compliance are usually treated as negligence claims under PI, subject to the terms. Insurers may look at whether the communication was framed as general information or specific advice, so scope matters; see advice versus information. Our guide Do energy assessors need PI insurance? explains what a policy for this work usually includes.
During the transition, client communications need more care than usual. The checks that help are:
Landlords need particular care; see AI advice to landlords on EPC C by 2030 and AI-written EPC improvement advice.
Apex arranges PI for energy assessors through the transition to new EPCs. A broker reviews how your policy treats advice given alongside certificates and AI-drafted client material. See the AI in energy assessment hub.
MHCLG's January 2026 partial response said government was working hard to deliver new EPCs from October 2026 and described the timeline as ambitious. Check the current position with your accreditation scheme before advising clients.
For domestic EPCs the response sets four headline metrics: energy cost, fabric performance, heating system and smart readiness, with secondary energy demand and carbon metrics. The methodology is being developed through the Home Energy Model.
You can use a tool to estimate, but present the result as an estimate and not as an assessment. Make sure the tool reflects the new methodology rather than the old single rating, and record how you checked it.
The partial response commits to making sure schemes and assessors are equipped for the new methodology. It sets out no change to accreditation or PI. Scheme rules continue to set minimum cover.
Tell us about your firm and the work you do. A broker will review how your current PI treats AI-assisted work, or arrange new cover. No fee for a quote. Or call 0117 325 0027.
Start a PI quote Request a callbackApex Insurance Brokers Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Registered in England and Wales, company number 07014570. This page is general information about how AI is used in the profession and how insurance may respond. It is not legal, regulatory or insurance advice on your circumstances, and it does not guarantee that cover will be available or on what terms.