FCA authorised · FRN 724952 0117 325 0027Quote & buy →
Apex Insurance Brokers
Speak to a brokerGet a quote →

Aipedia: Optometrists and opticians

AI in contact lens fitting and aftercare

AI can help analyse corneal topography, suggest lens parameters and run remote aftercare, but the practitioner remains responsible for the fit and for spotting complications. Contact lens complications such as microbial keratitis can be sight-threatening, so app-driven follow-up needs careful design and records.

In short

Contact lens practitioners use AI in topography analysis, lens selection for specialist and orthokeratology fits, and remote aftercare apps that collect symptoms, photos and wearing times. Under the GOC Standards of Practice, effective 1 January 2025, practitioners must apply professional judgement to technology-generated data (7.8), work within scope (6.1) and keep clear, contemporaneous records (8.1). The main risk is a complication such as keratitis developing while an app, rather than a clinician, is managing follow-up. Indemnity usually responds to claims about fitting and aftercare decisions, subject to the policy terms.

How AI is used in contact lens practice

Contact lens work has always been data heavy. AI now helps interpret corneal topography and tomography, suggests first-fit parameters for toric, multifocal, scleral or orthokeratology lenses and predicts how a lens is likely to sit. After fitting, remote aftercare apps ask wearers about comfort, redness and wearing time, collect photos of the eye and remind them about replacement schedules. Some apps triage responses and decide whether the wearer needs to be seen.

For specialist fitting, AI can cut the number of trial lenses. For routine aftercare, it can keep in touch with wearers who would otherwise lapse. In both cases the tool works on what it is given, and a red eye described as "a bit sore" may not trigger the right response.

The duties that apply

The relevant duties are:

The College of Optometrists' interim AI position says AI is there to support clinicians, not replace them, and stresses patient safety.

Complications after missed aftercare

Illustrative scenario: a practice moves routine aftercare for daily-wear patients to an app. A wearer reports mild discomfort and redness in a questionnaire. The app's rules classify this as low priority and send hygiene advice. No one at the practice reviews the response. Two days later the wearer attends hospital with microbial keratitis and alleges that the practice should have told them to remove the lenses and be seen urgently.

Other risks include app reminders failing silently, wearers ignoring in-app advice that a human would have followed up, topography-led fits accepted without slit-lamp assessment of the fit, and orthokeratology patients drifting out of review. The more the app does, the more important it is that someone owns its settings and checks how it performs.

Record keeping when an app drives follow-up

When something goes wrong, the record needs to show what the wearer reported, what the app did, who reviewed it and what advice was given. If app data sits in a separate system that is not linked to the patient record, the practice may struggle to show what happened. Standard 8.1 applies to all of it.

GOC Standard 12.2 requires adequate indemnity, continuous cover and run-off. A claim arising from fitting or aftercare is usually treated as a claim about the practitioner's or practice's professional care, subject to the policy wording. If the app itself failed, the practice that chose and deployed it may also face questions, and recovery from the supplier depends on the contract.

Practical controls

These steps reduce the risk:

Related: AI dispensing, AI scribes and records, AI chatbots and recalls and the optical AI hub.

How Apex helps

Apex arranges PI for contact lens practitioners and optical businesses. A broker can review how your cover treats app-based aftercare; see our optometrist and optician PI guide.

Sources

Frequently asked

Can a remote aftercare app replace an in-person check?

It can support aftercare but should not replace clinical review where symptoms or risk factors need it. Under Standard 7.8 a practitioner must apply judgement to the app's data, and wearers with pain, redness or reduced vision need prompt assessment.

Who is responsible for an AI-suggested lens fit?

The practitioner who accepts and dispenses the lens. Suggested parameters are data, and the fit should be assessed and recorded. Specialist fits also need to be within your scope under Standard 6.1.

Do aftercare app messages count as clinical records?

They should be treated as part of the record. Standard 8.1 requires clear and contemporaneous records, so symptoms reported, advice given and any review should be retrievable and linked to the patient.

Does PI cover keratitis claims involving an aftercare app?

Usually the claim is treated as one about the practice's professional care, and PI commonly responds subject to the wording. Check whether the policy says anything about software or remote services, and declare app-based aftercare to your insurer.

Check your PI covers how you use AI

Tell us about your firm and the work you do. A broker will review how your current PI treats AI-assisted work, or arrange new cover. No fee for a quote. Or call 0117 325 0027.

Start a PI quote Request a callback

Apex Insurance Brokers Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Registered in England and Wales, company number 07014570. This page is general information about how AI is used in the profession and how insurance may respond. It is not legal, regulatory or insurance advice on your circumstances, and it does not guarantee that cover will be available or on what terms.