Aipedia: Veterinary surgeons and practices
The RCVS says AI tasks should be delegated only to staff with appropriate knowledge and training, and lay staff should be reminded of their confidentiality duties. When a delegated AI task goes wrong, the vet who delegated and the practice leaders who set up the system can both be accountable.
Part of: AI in veterinary practice
In short
In a practice, AI tools may be used by the whole team: nurses run analysers and draft discharge notes, receptionists handle chatbots and booking tools, and administrators prepare insurance forms. The RCVS Spring 2026 advice says AI tasks should go only to staff with "appropriate knowledge and training", and that lay staff should be reminded of confidentiality. Chapter 18 governs delegation to veterinary nurses, and paragraph 17.8 makes leaders responsible for systems at least as accountable as those following them. Claims usually name the practice, and the vet who delegated keeps responsibility for clinical decisions.
AI rarely sits with one person. In a typical practice, registered veterinary nurses (RVNs) use AI-assisted lab analysers, draft discharge instructions and run nurse clinics with scribe tools. Student nurses and care assistants may enter data into dose calculators. Reception staff manage website chatbots, AI booking assistants and phone triage scripts. Administrative staff use AI to draft estimates, complete pet insurance claim forms and answer emails.
Each of these touches the clinical record, client data or advice given to owners. The RCVS advice treats choosing to use a tool as a professional responsibility, and that responsibility does not disappear when the task is handed to someone else.
Several existing duties apply to this work:
RVNs are regulated by the RCVS in their own right, and the AI advice is addressed to vets and vet nurses alike. Both are expected to appraise AI output critically.
Illustrative scenario: a receptionist, keen to help during a busy evening, uses a generative AI chatbot to answer an owner's message about a cat that has eaten part of a lily. The tool gives general advice to watch for vomiting. The receptionist passes it on without asking a vet. The cat needed urgent treatment. The complaint is about the practice, and the question becomes who allowed a lay member of staff to give clinical advice using an unapproved tool.
Other examples include a student nurse accepting an analyser result outside the range the tool was validated for, or an administrator pasting a full clinical history into a public chatbot to draft an insurance form, exposing client data.
Owners may claim against the practice, and employers are commonly liable for the acts of employees in the course of their work. The vet who delegated a clinical task remains responsible for the decision, and leaders who designed or approved the workflow can face professional criticism under 17.8. Practice PI usually extends to employees acting for the practice, subject to the policy terms. Locums are different: Chapter 17.18 warns that practice cover may not cover a locum, so locums who use practice AI tools should check their own position. See veterinary PI and the RCVS and PI for locum professionals.
Put these controls in place:
Related: the RCVS AI advice, AI lab analysers, practice chatbots and the AI in veterinary practice hub.
Apex arranges PI for veterinary practices, vets and locums. A broker reviews how your cover applies to employees and locums using AI tools, and where gaps may sit.
Yes. The RCVS AI advice is addressed to vets and vet nurses, and AI tasks can be delegated to staff with appropriate knowledge and training. Chapter 18 still governs what nurses may do under a vet's direction.
For admin such as bookings and opening hours, usually yes, if the practice has approved the tool. Clinical questions should go to a vet or nurse. Chapter 19 covers treatment by unqualified persons, and the RCVS says lay staff must be reminded of confidentiality.
Claims may name the practice, and employers are commonly liable for employees acting in the course of their work. The delegating vet remains responsible for the clinical decision, and leaders are accountable for systems under 17.8.
There is no specific RCVS requirement to keep a training log, but the advice links delegation to appropriate knowledge and training. A simple record of who has been trained on which tool is the easiest way to show that.
Tell us about your firm and the work you do. A broker will review how your current PI treats AI-assisted work, or arrange new cover. No fee for a quote. Or call 0117 325 0027.
Start a PI quote Request a callbackApex Insurance Brokers Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Registered in England and Wales, company number 07014570. This page is general information about how AI is used in the profession and how insurance may respond. It is not legal, regulatory or insurance advice on your circumstances, and it does not guarantee that cover will be available or on what terms.