SEO meta - Title: Commercial Run-Off Cover — When a Business Closes, What Cover Continues? | Apex - Meta description: The architectural overview of commercial run-off cover. Every insurance policy a closing business has, what survives closure, what does not, and the structural decisions any board faces in the 90 days before cessation. - Slug:
/commercial-run-off-cover/general-guide/- Primary keyword: commercial run-off cover - Secondary keywords: business closure insurance, run-off insurance UK, what happens to insurance when business closes, post-closure cover, run-off claims-made, occurrence-based run-off - Schema:Article+FAQPage+HowTo
A commercial business that ceases to trade does not cease to be exposed to claims. The trading entity may dissolve, the assets may be distributed, the directors may move on — but the claims that arise from the period of trading continue to arrive for years and in some cases decades afterwards. Whether those claims find a policy to respond to them depends on choices made in the months before closure that most directors will never have been trained to make.
This guide is the architectural overview. It addresses every insurance contract a typical UK mid-market commercial business holds, what happens to each at closure, what continues to respond automatically, what does not, and what additional cover should be considered. The seven sector-specific deep-dives in this section drill into the particular issues for construction contractors, manufacturers, directors, property owners, cyber, pension trustees and the operations of closure itself.
General guidance only — your specific circumstances require specialist advice. Apex Insurance Brokers Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority, FRN 724952.
Commercial run-off cover is, broadly, insurance that responds to claims relating to a business’s past trading after the business has stopped trading. The term is most commonly used in the context of professional indemnity and directors’ and officers’ liability cover, which are written on a claims-made basis and require explicit run-off at closure. But the concept extends to any policy whose cover requires the policyholder to remain a going concern, and to any liability that survives the closure of the business.
The crucial distinction across the commercial insurance estate is between claims-made policies and occurrence-based policies:
Claims-made policies respond to claims first made and notified during the period of insurance. The policy in force when the claim is made is the one that pays. If the business closes, there is no future policy. Run-off cover is essential.
Occurrence-based policies respond to incidents that occurred during the period of insurance, regardless of when the claim is made. The policy in force when the incident happened is the one that pays. The business’s closure does not extinguish the policy’s response to historic incidents — if the policy is still findable.
The standard UK commercial estate uses both bases: - Property, BI, motor, marine: occurrence-based or first-loss basis. Generally not requiring run-off; historic incidents are covered by the historic policy. - Public liability, employers’ liability, products liability: occurrence-based traditionally. Modern wordings sometimes claims-made; check carefully. Where occurrence-based, historic claims are covered by historic policies even after closure. - Professional indemnity: claims-made-and-notified. Run-off essential. - Directors’ and officers’: claims-made. Run-off essential. - Cyber: hybrid — claims-made for liability heads, events-discovered for first-party. Run-off important. - Crime / fidelity: claims-made with discovery period typically.
The cessation conversation must therefore address each policy on its own terms.
During trading: standard all-risks commercial property policy covering buildings, contents, stock, machinery at insured premises against insured perils.
At closure: the policy lapses at the next renewal after cessation, or by mid-term cancellation, refunded on a pro-rata basis. If property is sold during closure, the cover transfers (if assignable) or terminates on sale.
Run-off treatment: none required in the traditional sense. The historic incident during trading is covered by the historic policy.
Hidden issue: any property damage that occurred during trading but is discovered after cessation may engage the historic policy. The policy retains response to events during the period of insurance. Notification windows in the policy may be a constraint; check the late-discovery clause.
During trading: BI extension to property covering loss of revenue or gross profit from insured property damage.
At closure: lapses with property.
Run-off treatment: the BI head conceptually ceases to be relevant once the business is no longer earning revenue. Historic claims (a fire two years ago, BI now finally settled) remain payable.
During trading: cover for legal liability to third parties for bodily injury or property damage.
At closure: the policy lapses on expiry of the current period. If occurrence-based, historic incidents remain covered.
Run-off treatment: in principle none required for occurrence-based wordings. Historic incidents (a slip-and-trip at a former premises two years ago, now coming through as a claim) remain covered by the historic policy.
Critical wrinkle: if the policy renewals were not maintained year-on-year, there may be gaps. The claimant’s lawyer will identify the year of incident and look for the policy in force then. Lost policy documentation is a substantial issue for older claims.
During trading: cover for legal liability for bodily injury or property damage caused by the insured’s products.
At closure: lapses on expiry. Critical for any manufacturer or distributor — product remains in the market after the business ceases.
Run-off treatment: the products liability run-off is the cessation conversation most commonly missed. The product placed on the market may cause harm years or decades later. The historic policy in force when the product was placed responds (occurrence-based) — but if the policy is no longer available, the claim falls on the dissolved entity’s residual assets and ultimately on directors personally if their indemnities have been triggered.
See Deep-Dive 3: Manufacturer product liability run-off.
During trading: statutory cover under the Employers’ Liability (Compulsory Insurance) Act 1969 for employee injury.
At closure: lapses on cessation. Statutory requirement ends when there are no employees.
Run-off treatment: the EL cover is occurrence-based — incidents during trading remain covered. The Employers’ Liability Tracing Office (ELTO) maintains a central register to help injured employees find historic policies. Disease claims (asbestos, mesothelioma, NIHL) frequently arrive 20–40 years after exposure; the ELTO register is the operational answer.
Critical wrinkle: dissolved companies create a Compensation Act 2006 / Third Parties (Rights against Insurers) Act 2010 problem. The injured employee may need to restore the company at Companies House to pursue the policy. The restoration mechanism under CA 2006 section 1029 is well-established but adds time and cost.
During trading: cover for directorial exposure to claims by shareholders, regulators, creditors and others.
At closure: the policy is claims-made. Standard practice is to bind a run-off policy (sometimes called a tail or extended discovery period) at closure, covering claims first made for a fixed period after cessation (typically 6 years).
Run-off treatment: essential. See Deep-Dive 4: D&O run-off after dissolution.
During trading: cover for negligent advice claims, claims-made.
At closure: if the business is a professional services firm with PI, the run-off conversation is the most consequential. For commercial businesses with smaller PI heads (consultancy bolt-ons, sectoral advisory work), the same logic applies.
Run-off treatment: essential for any business with PI exposure. See the PI-side run-off deep-dives at /run-off-cover-deep-dives/.
During trading: hybrid cover.
At closure: the run-off question is materially different from the conventional claims-made covers. See Deep-Dive 6: Cyber run-off.
During trading: cover for theft, employee dishonesty, computer fraud, social engineering.
At closure: typically claims-made with discovery period. The discovery period (typically 6–12 months post-cessation) covers losses discovered after cessation but committed during trading.
Run-off treatment: extended discovery period available at additional premium; can be material for businesses with high employee dishonesty risk.
During trading: vehicle insurance.
At closure: terminates with disposal of fleet. Historic incidents covered by historic policies.
During trading: cargo, hull, freight.
At closure: terminates with cessation of operations.
During trading: cover for pollution incidents and remediation.
At closure: typically claims-made. The Environmental Protection Act 1990 Part 2A liabilities and the Water Resources Act 1991 liabilities can be long-tail. Specific EIL run-off cover available.
During trading: trustee indemnity.
At closure / buyout: see Deep-Dive 7: Pension trustee run-off.
For any commercial business approaching cessation, the 90-day pre-cessation framework is the operational standard.
Day -90 to -60: Strategic decisions. - Confirm cessation date and mechanism (voluntary liquidation, members’ voluntary, creditors’ voluntary, administration, simple dissolution, sale). - Identify all live insurance policies. - Identify all live claims and notified circumstances. - Identify all reasonably-anticipated future claims. - Engage broker on run-off strategy.
Day -60 to -30: Programme placement. - Bind D&O run-off (typical 6-year tail, can extend). - Bind PI run-off if relevant. - Bind cyber run-off if relevant. - Confirm crime extended discovery if relevant. - Confirm EIL run-off if relevant. - Confirm property and BI cancellation arrangements. - Confirm motor and marine terminations. - Confirm EL ELTO register submission of final policy.
Day -30 to 0: Operational closure. - Final policy refunds processed. - Run-off policies bound and certificates issued. - Directors briefed on residual exposures. - Insurance documentation archive established (this is critical — the documents need to be findable in 10 or 20 years). - Insurance documentation custodian identified post-closure (often the parent company, the principal shareholder, or a professional archive service).
Day 0 onward: Run-off operation. - Maintain insurance archive. - Renew run-off policies as required (D&O annual renewal during the run-off period). - Manage any incoming claims through the relevant policy.
The single most consequential point most directors miss: personal liability survives company closure.
Wrongful trading (Insolvency Act 1986 section 214). Directors who allowed the company to continue trading when insolvent face personal liability for the increase in deficiency. Run-off D&O cover is the protection.
Misfeasance (Insolvency Act 1986 section 212). Insolvency practitioners can pursue directors for breach of duty during trading. Run-off D&O cover.
Personal guarantees. Directors who gave personal guarantees to banks, landlords, suppliers or insurers remain bound after company closure. Insurance does not assist.
Disqualification proceedings under the CDDA 1986. Directors of failed companies can face disqualification under the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986. Defence costs typically covered under D&O run-off.
Statutory regulator action (FCA, HMRC, environment agency, HSE). Personal regulatory action against directors after company closure continues. D&O run-off and EIL run-off provide cover; criminal proceedings (where applicable) generally fall outside.
Tax investigations (HMRC). Director personal tax investigations can run for years. Not typically within D&O scope unless explicitly extended.
The protection is the D&O run-off plus the documentation infrastructure to evidence the trading record.
Where closure is via formal insolvency (administration, CVL, MVL, compulsory liquidation), the insolvency practitioner takes control of the company’s affairs from appointment. The IP’s relationship with the existing insurance estate is critical.
IP duties to maintain certain cover. The IP will typically maintain property cover (where the asset is to be sold and insurable value needs protection), public liability cover (where operations continue during the realisation period), and statutory cover (EL where employees remain).
The directors’ D&O. The directors will frequently negotiate continued personal D&O cover, often by independently binding a run-off policy at their personal cost or through pre-cessation board approval. The IP’s relationship with the D&O policy varies by insurer.
Subrogation and recovery. The IP may seek to recover from the company’s policies for losses to the company. The interaction between IP recovery and director personal indemnity is a frequent point of dispute.
Documentation handover. The IP will typically take custody of insurance documentation. Directors should ensure they have personal copies of policies relevant to their personal exposure, with particular attention to D&O wordings.
A family-owned plastics manufacturer in the South East, 75 employees, £24m turnover, decides to wind up after the founders retire and no third-generation buyer emerges. The company is solvent; the closure is a members’ voluntary liquidation under section 89 of the Insolvency Act 1986.
The insurance estate at decision: - Commercial combined (property, BI, public liability, products liability, employers’ liability): £85k annual. - Directors’ and officers’ liability: £8k annual, £5m limit. - Cyber insurance: £18k annual, £5m limit. - Crime/fidelity: £6k annual, £2m limit. - Motor fleet (8 vehicles): £14k annual. - Marine cargo (occasional): £4k annual. - Environmental impairment liability: £12k annual, £2m limit.
The 90-day plan:
Days -90 to -60. Founders confirm cessation date (15 months out). Broker engaged. Initial run-off scoping: D&O £5m for 6 years, cyber £5m ERP for 6 years, products liability tail through historic insurer’s existing policy run-off automatic, EIL £2m for 10 years.
Days -60 to -30. D&O run-off quoted at £24k single premium (6 years, £5m limit). Cyber ERP quoted at £42k single premium (6 years, £5m limit). Crime extended discovery to 6 years at £8k. EIL 10-year run-off at £35k.
Days -30 to 0. All run-off bound. Property, BI, motor and marine cancelled at cessation with pro-rata refunds. EL last policy with employees during MVL realisation period kept active. ELTO submission of final EL policy made.
Post-cessation. D&O reviewed annually during the 6-year tail; cyber ERP held; EIL held for 10 years; documentation archive established with the liquidator and copies retained by the founder family.
Total run-off cost. Approximately £109k single premium plus the continuing operational covers during the realisation period (perhaps a further £35k). For a £24m turnover business, this is a defensible commercial cost given the personal exposure of the founder family.
Indicative pricing for run-off across the common commercial covers (2026):
D&O run-off. Single premium typically 2.5x–4.5x the last annual premium for a 6-year tail. Materially higher for businesses with regulatory exposure, large turnover or open claims.
PI run-off. 2.0x–3.5x for a 6-year tail at standard limits. Sector and claims history are dominant drivers.
Cyber ERP. 2.0x–3.0x annual premium for a 6-year extended reporting period.
Crime extended discovery. 0.5x–1.0x annual premium per additional year of discovery (typical extension 3–6 years).
EIL run-off. 1.5x–3.0x annual premium per additional year, with substantial variation by site contamination history.
Products liability run-off. Historic policies typically continue to respond automatically; specific bound run-off rare. Where bound for known long-tail exposure (e.g. construction products), pricing varies enormously.
For any commercial business approaching cessation:
Begin the run-off conversation 12 months before cessation, not 90 days before. Pricing and wording materially improve with planning time.
Identify every live policy. Identify every notified claim and circumstance. Identify reasonably anticipated future claims.
For each policy, ask: claims-made or occurrence? What happens to historic incidents after cessation? Is run-off needed?
For directors: bind personal D&O run-off independent of the company’s other arrangements. The director-personal logic is independent of the company solvency picture.
Establish an insurance documentation archive that will be findable in 10–20 years. Personal copies, organisation copies, professional custody — multiple redundancy.
Document the trading-record conditions for future D&O claims. Board minutes, financial records, regulatory communications, compliance evidence — preserve these for the run-off period.
Maintain a single point of contact for run-off claims handling — the broker, a former finance director, or a professional service.
Plan for the regulatory tail. HMRC investigations can run for 20 years; ICO investigations for 6+ years; HSE investigations for 12+ years; sector regulator action varies.
Q1. Does ordinary business insurance respond after I close? For occurrence-based covers (most public liability, employers’ liability and products liability), yes — to historic incidents. For claims-made covers (D&O, PI, cyber liability), no — without run-off bound.
Q2. How long does run-off cover need to last? Depends on the cover and the underlying limitation framework. D&O typically 6 years matching the standard limitation period for misfeasance. Products liability for manufactured goods typically 10–15 years matching the limitation/long-stop framework. EIL typically 10 years.
Q3. Can I extend run-off beyond the initial period? Sometimes. For D&O the initial 6-year tail can sometimes be extended at year 5 or 6 if claims look likely. For PI, extensions are routine but priced. For products liability, generally not.
Q4. What if I forget to bind run-off and a claim arrives? The cover position depends on the policy. For claims-made covers without run-off, the claim is uninsured. The historic policy may respond if the circumstance was notified before policy expiry under the relevant policy’s notification machinery (the precautionary notification is critical).
Q5. Who pays for run-off in an insolvency? For company-level run-off (D&O, PI, cyber), the insolvent estate ideally funds. In practice, directors often fund personally where the estate has insufficient assets. The cost is rarely recoverable from the estate even if estate funds are available.
Q6. What about the company’s records — do I need to keep insurance documents? Yes. The Statement of Affairs in insolvency captures known policies, but the practical operation of a claim 10 years post-closure requires the actual policy documents. Personal copies plus organisation archive plus (where available) the broker’s records.
Q7. Does CA 2006 strike-off cure all liabilities? No. Section 1029 restoration is the standard mechanism to pursue claims against a struck-off company. Restoration can be applied for years after strike-off.
Q8. What about director personal guarantees to landlords and banks? Personal guarantees survive company closure and are not affected by insurance. Director financial planning at closure should specifically address each personal guarantee.
Q9. Are run-off premiums tax-deductible? Generally yes, where the company funds. The expense relates to the trade. Specific tax position should be confirmed with the company’s accountants and HMRC.
Q10. Can I buy run-off post-closure? Usually no for claims-made covers. The run-off binder must be in place at cessation. This is the single most-missed commercial decision in cessation planning.
Insolvency Act 1986, sections 89 (MVL), 212 (misfeasance), 214 (wrongful trading). Companies Act 2006, section 1029 (restoration). Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986. Employers’ Liability (Compulsory Insurance) Act 1969. Third Parties (Rights against Insurers) Act 2010. Consumer Protection Act 1987. Environmental Protection Act 1990, Part 2A. Limitation Act 1980. Defective Premises Act 1972 (as amended by Building Safety Act 2022). Employers’ Liability Tracing Office (ELTO) Code of Practice. ICAEW Technical Release on cessation accounting and insurance. Various insolvency practitioner guidance (R3, ICAEW IP unit).
Index: Commercial Run-Off Deep-Dives Deep-Dive 2: Construction contractor run-off Deep-Dive 3: Manufacturer product liability run-off Deep-Dive 4: D&O run-off after dissolution Deep-Dive 5: Property owners run-off Deep-Dive 6: Cyber run-off Deep-Dive 7: Pension trustee run-off
Disclaimer: General guidance only. Specific cessation and insurance decisions require specialist advice. Apex Insurance Brokers Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority, FRN 724952.
Apex Insurance Brokers serves UK professional services firms and commercial businesses. Call 0117 325 0027, email hello@apexinsurancebrokers.co.uk, or request a quotation.
Get a quote