This case study is an anonymised composite based on publicly reported commercial insurance claim patterns. It is not actual Apex client data and does not constitute legal or insurance advice. Names, locations and identifying details have been changed. Apex Insurance Brokers Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority, FRN 724952.
A multi-academy trust (MAT) running seven schools across the South West, approximately 4,200 pupils total, central executive team of nine and a board of twelve trustees. The trust holds the standard Department for Education-required suite of insurance arrangements through its chosen provider and supplements these with a bespoke trustees’ liability (D&O) policy with a £5m limit and an indemnity wording aligned to the Charities Act 2011 and Companies Act 2006 duties of trustees and directors.
One of the trust’s secondary schools, judged “Good” at its previous inspection three years earlier, was inspected by Ofsted under the Education Inspection Framework. The inspection concluded with a “Requires Improvement” judgment overall and an “Inadequate” judgment on leadership and management, with specific concerns recorded around safeguarding record-keeping, behaviour management, off-rolling allegations made by a former parent, and the response to a series of parental complaints over the preceding eighteen months that the inspectors considered had not been adequately addressed by the trust’s central team.
The published report attracted significant local and trade press attention. Within four weeks the trust’s central executive team received a letter from solicitors instructed by a group of seven parents and one former staff member, intimating a claim against the trustees personally for breach of duty under the Companies Act 2006 sections 171–174 (the directors’ duties to act within powers, promote the success of the company, exercise independent judgment, and exercise reasonable care, skill and diligence), and against the trust for negligent management of the school. The factual allegations included failure to act on whistleblowing disclosures from teaching staff, failure to commission an independent safeguarding review when concerns were raised, and inadequate oversight of the school’s executive head.
A parallel referral was made by Ofsted to the Department for Education under its formal escalation procedures, and the Department issued a Notice of Concern requiring the trust to commission an independent review and produce an action plan. The Charity Commission opened a regulatory engagement (rather than a formal inquiry) given the trust’s charitable status under the Charities Act 2011.
The intimated claim against the trustees was novel in form and somewhat unusual in target. The claimants did not seek monetary damages on a primary basis; the principal remedy sought was a court declaration of breach of duty and an order for the trustees to commission and publish an independent review at the trust’s expense. Secondary monetary claims included loss-of-earnings claims by the former staff member (£140,000) and reimbursement of private tutoring costs incurred by two of the parents for children who had been removed from the school (£18,000 combined).
The claim against the trust itself, advanced in parallel, sought damages for negligent management on behalf of the same group of parents and the former staff member, with pleaded quantum of approximately £380,000 total.
The trustees, faced with both a personal-capacity claim and the duty to act in the best interests of the trust as defendants in the trust-level claim, found themselves in a position where their personal interests and the trust’s institutional interests required separate consideration. The trustees’ liability cover became the central protection.
The trustees’ liability (D&O) policy responded under its Side A (non-indemnifiable personal liability) coverage on the personal-capacity claim. Notification was made within seven working days of the solicitor’s letter. The insurer accepted the notification and instructed specialist D&O defence counsel to represent the trustees in their personal capacity, separate from the solicitor representing the trust on the institutional claim.
The Side B (indemnifiable corporate reimbursement) and Side C (entity coverage) elements of the policy did not respond to the institutional claim — the trust’s own combined liability and professional indemnity covers handled that pathway. The D&O policy’s “regulatory investigation” extension responded to the costs of the trustees’ personal engagement with the Department for Education’s escalation process and the Charity Commission’s regulatory engagement.
The defence position on the personal-capacity claim addressed each pleaded duty: the trustees demonstrated a documented programme of school visits, executive team meetings, scrutiny questions raised at board meetings on the school’s performance trajectory, and engagement with the parental complaints through the trust’s complaints procedure. The independent review commissioned in response to the Department’s Notice of Concern was completed and presented findings broadly supportive of the trustees’ conduct while accepting that some specific oversight points could have been handled differently.
The personal-capacity claim was dismissed at a strike-out hearing approximately fifteen months after intimation, with the court finding that the pleaded breach of duty was not made out on the facts. The institutional claim against the trust settled at mediation at approximately £180,000 plus costs, paid under the trust’s combined liability cover. The trustees’ D&O policy paid defence costs of approximately £240,000 across the matter.
The school’s subsequent re-inspection by Ofsted, conducted approximately nine months after the original inspection, produced a “Good” judgment with the inspection report noting the substantial changes made by the trust including a new executive head, restructured safeguarding arrangements, and a strengthened parental engagement process. The Department for Education’s Notice of Concern was lifted. The Charity Commission’s regulatory engagement closed.
The trustees’ D&O policy renewed at the next renewal with a 28% premium increase and an additional condition precedent requiring the trust to operate a documented whistleblowing procedure aligned to the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998. The trust’s combined liability and professional indemnity covers renewed at modest increases.
Education sector D&O claims are an emerging area and one that has not yet stabilised in its claim patterns. First, trustees of multi-academy trusts and independent schools face personal-capacity claim exposure that is structurally distinct from the institution’s own exposure — the cover required is correspondingly distinct. Second, the £1m limits often offered as default on charity D&O extensions are inadequate for substantial multi-academy trusts; £5m is increasingly the appropriate floor. Third, the Side A / Side B / Side C structure of the policy matters — Side A protects trustees personally when the trust cannot or will not indemnify, and is the most critical element. Fourth, regulatory investigation cover for Ofsted, Department for Education and Charity Commission engagement should be a specific extension, not assumed. Fifth, the trustees should obtain separate legal advice from the trust’s own legal advice when a personal-capacity claim is intimated; the insurer-appointed defence counsel is the appropriate route.
We would have benchmarked the trust’s D&O cover at the previous renewal against current quantum and would have specifically flagged the Side A and regulatory investigation extensions. At notification, we would have engaged with both the trust’s company secretary and the trustees personally to ensure separate notifications were lodged correctly under both the D&O and combined liability policies. We would also have advised on the publication strategy for the independent review and the Ofsted re-inspection — the documents that drive the next three renewals of the trust’s covers and that determine how the wider sector underwrites multi-academy trusts as a class.
For the underlying cover, see our Education insurance hub.
Apex Insurance Brokers serves UK professional services firms and commercial businesses. Call 0117 325 0027, email hello@apexinsurancebrokers.co.uk, or request a quotation.
Get a quote