This case study is an anonymised composite based on publicly reported commercial insurance claim patterns. It is not actual Apex client data and does not constitute legal or insurance advice. Names, locations and identifying details have been changed. Apex Insurance Brokers Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority, FRN 724952.
An independent used-car dealership in a Wiltshire market town, around 110 vehicles on the forecourt at any time, turnover £6.6m. The proprietor and two sales staff between them handle around 950 retail sales a year, plus some part-exchange wholesaling. The business is covered by a combined motor trade policy that includes road risks (any vehicle owned by the business, plus customer vehicles in care, custody and control for purposes of the trade), premises, contents, money and combined liability.
A customer purchased a four-year-old Audi A5 on a Friday afternoon, paid the balance by bank transfer, signed the V5/2 new keeper section, took delivery of the keys and drove away. The standard practice at this dealership was for the customer to arrange their own private motor insurance before driving home, with the salesperson verifying a screenshot of the cover note before releasing the keys.
The customer in this case showed a screenshot from his phone of what appeared to be a fully comprehensive private policy in his name with a major direct insurer. The salesperson glanced at the screen, noted the vehicle registration and the policy effective date, and released the keys. The customer drove off the forecourt at about 4:45pm.
Forty minutes later, on the A350 returning home, the customer was involved in a serious collision with a motorcyclist. The motorcyclist sustained life-changing injuries — a complex pelvic fracture, traumatic brain injury, and lower-limb amputation — and was airlifted to the major trauma centre at Southmead Hospital.
When the police accessed the Motor Insurance Database the following morning, the Audi was not listed as insured to any policy. Investigation revealed that the screenshot the customer had shown was from a partially completed quote process; the customer had selected cover, entered card details, but the policy had been declined for verification reasons by the direct insurer and the customer’s card had not been charged. The customer believed cover had incepted because the quote screen had shown a policy number. It had not. The vehicle was uninsured at the moment of the accident.
The motorcyclist’s solicitor lodged a claim against the customer personally, against the Motor Insurers’ Bureau (MIB) under the Uninsured Drivers Agreement, and — critically — against the dealership, alleging that the dealership had been the keeper or owner of the vehicle at the moment of the accident, and alternatively that the dealership had been negligent in releasing the vehicle without verifying cover properly.
The motorcyclist’s claim was pleaded at approximately £2.8m on a future-care basis, with the Ogden Tables applied to a substantial future-loss-of-earnings element and a significant care and case management claim under the Damages Act 1996 structured-settlement provisions. The pleading against the dealership advanced three alternative causes of action: (a) ownership of the vehicle at the time of the accident because (the claimant argued) the sale was incomplete pending insurance; (b) negligent release of a vehicle to a driver the dealership knew or ought to have known was uninsured; and (c) breach of statutory duty under the Road Traffic Act 1988 for permitting an uninsured driver to use a vehicle.
The dealership’s principal protection was its motor trade road-risks cover, but the policy contained a specific exclusion for “vehicles sold and delivered to a customer for use on the road” — the standard wording across the market. The exclusion meant the road-risks cover did not respond to a vehicle that had passed out of the dealership’s care, custody and control.
The dealership notified the broker on the Saturday morning, within fifteen hours of the incident. The road-risks insurer was put on notice but indicated very early that the sold-and-delivered exclusion would be engaged. The combined liability insurer was put on notice as the alternative cover for the negligent-release allegation, on the basis that this was a public liability exposure arising out of the conduct of the business rather than a road traffic exposure on a vehicle in the dealership’s care.
The combined liability insurer accepted the notification and instructed defence solicitors. The defence position addressed each pleaded cause of action: (a) ownership had clearly passed — the V5/2 was signed, the funds were cleared, the keys were released — and the dealership was no longer the keeper for Road Traffic Act 1988 purposes; (b) the practice of relying on customer-supplied screenshots was demonstrated to be consistent with industry norm at the time of the sale, but was indefensible against expert evidence on what a reasonably competent dealer ought to do; (c) the statutory duty argument was novel and was strongly resisted, with the MIB taking the lead on uninsured-driver indemnity to the claimant in any event.
The MIB met the bulk of the third-party claim. The negligent-release argument against the dealership was settled at mediation on a contribution basis at £180,000 plus costs, paid under the combined liability cover with a £2,500 excess. The road-risks policy did not contribute. The dealership’s defence costs across two insurers totalled approximately £85,000.
The settlement, by reference to the size of the underlying claim, was modest — but the impact on the dealership’s renewal was significant. The combined liability policy renewed with a 38% rate increase, an additional condition precedent on documented vehicle handover procedures, and a requirement for the dealership to verify customer insurance through the Motor Insurance Database rather than by inspection of a screenshot. The road-risks insurer remained on cover but issued a written reminder of the sold-and-delivered exclusion. The dealership instituted a new handover protocol requiring a printed Motor Insurance Database confirmation for every retail sale, with the customer’s cover note number recorded on the sales invoice.
Motor trade insurance is a layered product, and the coverage gaps between layers are where claims live. First, road risks does not cover sold vehicles — it covers vehicles in the dealership’s care, custody and control. The moment ownership passes and the customer drives off, the road-risks policy ceases to respond. Second, the combined liability cover may respond to negligent handover allegations, but only if the dealership’s procedures are documented and defensible against expert evidence on industry norms. Third, the Motor Insurance Database (askMID) is the only reliable way to verify customer cover — screenshots and verbal assurances are not. Fourth, the V5/2 new-keeper section and proof of payment are documentary essentials for any sale; both should be on file before keys are released. Fifth, a written customer-handover checklist signed by the salesperson and counter-signed by the customer is the single most cost-effective risk management measure available to an independent dealership.
We would have audited the dealership’s handover protocol at the previous renewal and flagged the screenshot practice as a known coverage exposure. Most independent dealers we deal with run on industry-norm procedures that have not been updated since the askMID service became free for trade users in 2018 — the cost of an upgrade is essentially zero. At notification, we would have managed the cross-notification between road-risks and combined liability insurers in a way that protected both wordings, and we would have engaged independent expert evidence on industry handover practice early enough to support the defence on the negligent-release allegation.
For the underlying cover, see our Motor trade insurance hub and the corresponding Bristol motor trade city page.
Apex Insurance Brokers serves UK professional services firms and commercial businesses. Call 0117 325 0027, email hello@apexinsurancebrokers.co.uk, or request a quotation.
Get a quote