Reviewed by Matthew Bartlett, Director · Last reviewed 8 July 2026
Independent financial adviser PI in the UK is priced by an underwriter reading a submission against the FCA's PII rules for personal investment firms. There is no shelf price. The rate on turnover, the treatment of higher-risk advice areas (particularly defined benefit transfers), the practice's claims and complaints history, and the limits and excesses chosen all combine to produce the premium. This page sets out what actually drives the number for IFA firms and how Apex Insurance Brokers approaches an adviser PI submission.
Turnover is the anchor and the rate on turnover moves sharply with what the firm actually advises on. A firm doing straightforward independent whole-of-market retail investment advice with a low proportion of legacy business will attract one rate. A firm with historic exposure to defined benefit (DB) pension transfer advice will attract another, and DB transfer activity, historic or current, is now the single biggest rating factor in the personal investment PI market.
Claims and complaint history is read at the level of substance. The Financial Ombudsman Service publishes complaints data by firm above certain thresholds, and underwriters read that data alongside the firm's own disclosures. An upheld FOS complaint on unsuitable advice reads very differently from a jurisdiction complaint or a service complaint. The firm's compliance framework, file-review processes, permissions held, and whether the firm is directly authorised or an appointed representative are all factored in.
Limit of indemnity and excess are the levers the firm can pull. The FCA rules set minimum limits (see below), but many firms buy higher primary limits or add excess layers. Aggregate limits and how the wording sits alongside historic advice are material to the cost. The retention on FOS-level claims is often set at a higher figure than the retention on general PI claims because of the number of small-value FOS awards.
The FCA's PII requirements for personal investment firms are set out in IPRU-INV 13.1 and the linked capital resources rules. The minimum PI limits are set with reference to annual income: for firms with income up to £3 million, the required minimum single-claim limit is approximately £1.4 million and the aggregate limit is approximately £2 million (the exact figures are set in euros in the rulebook and converted for practical purposes). Firms with higher income face proportionately higher required limits.
COBS 9 (and COBS 9A for MiFID business) sets out the suitability obligations for advised business, and any suitability failure will typically be the ground for a PI claim or a FOS complaint. The Financial Ombudsman Service's compulsory jurisdiction covers eligible complainants up to an award limit of £430,000 for acts and omissions from 1 April 2024 (with a lower limit for earlier acts and omissions), and this figure typically drives the firm's approach to primary PI limit. Consumer Duty (PRIN 2A), in force from 31 July 2023 for open products and 31 July 2024 for closed products, has changed the shape of underwriters' file-review questions and the way advice suitability is tested.
Cover must be on a claims-made basis, must include defence costs, and, for firms that hold or handle client money, must include coverage for fraud and dishonesty. Run-off cover on cessation of authorisation is required and is often the single largest single-year expense a small adviser firm will face on exit.
Apex Insurance Brokers is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (firm reference number 724952) and places IFA and personal investment firm PI with insurers that have appetite for the sector. We are a named-broker practice: Matt Bartlett or a named colleague reads every submission personally, drafts the presentation, and negotiates on the firm's behalf.
Our client retention rate across the book is approximately 95%. We work with sole practitioners, small partnerships, and larger multi-adviser firms. Our approach is to engage on the historic and current advice mix in detail, particularly on any DB transfer activity, so that the underwriter sees the risk as it actually is rather than as a rolled-forward version of last year's numbers.
Any range published on a web page is a starting point for conversation, not a quote. With that on the record: a small IFA firm with modest income, no DB transfer exposure, clean claims and complaints history, and a straightforward advice mix will typically see primary PI premiums in the low thousands of pounds a year, with rates on income in the low to mid single digits of a percent. Firms with historic DB transfer activity, particularly at scale or with FOS decisions on the record, should expect very materially higher terms.
Mid-sized firms often pay a rate on turnover that moves substantially with the DB transfer question and with claim history. Firms with clean records, no DB exposure, and a straightforward independent advice mix should expect the market to compete for them. The specific figure comes out of the underwriter's assessment of the submission, not from a table.
Get a quote
Want a proper indication for your firm? A named broker reads every submission and comes back with terms within one working day.