Key UK professional negligence cases — 2020 to 2026
Reviewed by Apex Insurance Brokers · Published 15 July 2026
In short: The last six years have seen the Supreme Court reshape scope-of-duty (Manchester Building Society v Grant Thornton), aggregation (Various Claimants v AIG) and the Building Safety Act cases through the High Court and Court of Appeal.
Scope of duty
Manchester Building Society v Grant Thornton (2021): The Supreme Court reaffirmed and clarified the scope-of-duty principle from SAAMCO. Loss must be within the scope of the duty assumed.
Khan v Meadows (2021): Applied the SAAMCO framework in a fresh clinical setting; reinforced the six-stage test.
Practical impact: Insurers use scope-of-duty defences more actively; wordings often reference the doctrine.
Aggregation
Various Claimants v AIG (Impact Funding) 2021: Clarified 'series of events' aggregation for solicitors' PII.
Baines Wilson v Cellular Automations (2022): Related-claims treatment for advisory engagements.
Practical impact: Aggregation drafting in PI wordings has tightened; firms should check the language annually.
Building Safety Act 2022 litigation
Adriatic Land 5 Ltd v HREB (2023): First tribunal decisions on remediation orders.
Fairview Estates v Waite (2024): Applied s.135 retrospective liability to a design firm.
Practical impact: Design teams face a 30-year retrospective claim window for HRB work.
Reliance and third-party claims
NRAM v Steel (2018) — still applied: Solicitor's careless assurance to another party's lawyer.
Steel v NRAM Ltd — subsequent applications: Steel remains foundational for solicitor third-party liability.
Frequently asked
What was the most impactful case for architects?
Fairview Estates v Waite (2024) applying BSA 2022 s.135 to design firms was the most material for architects.
Which case changed scope-of-duty analysis?
Manchester Building Society v Grant Thornton (2021) restated the SAAMCO framework in six stages.
Has aggregation law changed?
The core principles are stable; recent cases have applied them in specific commercial and litigation-funding contexts.
What about clinical negligence cases?
Khan v Meadows (2021) is the most significant for clinical PI, applying SAAMCO in a fresh setting.
Should firms track case law annually?
Yes — PII policy wordings and defences move with the case law. Broker involvement helps.
Do these cases affect PII pricing?
Yes, particularly Fairview and its BSA 2022 line: architects and engineers now price this into cover terms.
Apex Insurance Brokers Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Firm reference number 724952. Registered in England and Wales, company number 07014570.
