FCA authorised · FRN 724952 0117 325 0027Quote & buy →
Aipedia: Debt advice firms
Debt management firms can automate plan reviews, payments and creditor updates, but CONC 8.8 and 8.6 still govern how plans are run and changed. Errors repeat across every plan the system touches, often for months before anyone notices.
Part of: AI in Debt advice firms
In short
Administering a debt management plan means collecting the customer's payment, distributing it to creditors, updating them and reviewing the plan as circumstances change. Automation and AI now handle much of this. CONC 8.8.1R(9) requires adequate records for each plan until the contract ends, and CONC 8.6 governs advice to stop or reduce contractual payments, including warnings and telling the customer when an approach is not working (CONC 8.6.5R). Payment errors can cause charges, defaults and complaints, and losses involving money held for customers can raise different insurance questions from advice errors.
Once a plan is set up, the work becomes operational and recurring. Firms use automation and AI to:
Where AI moves from processing to judgement, such as concluding at review that a plan is still suitable, the advice rules come back into play.
Records. CONC 8.8.1R(9) requires a firm to maintain adequate records for each debt management plan it administers, until the contract is completed or terminated. CONC 8.3.15G points to orderly records under SYSC 9.1.1R. An automated system must produce records that show what was paid, to whom and why.
Changing payments. CONC 8.6.1R says advice not to make a repayment, or to cancel the means of making one, before a solution is agreed must be demonstrably in the customer's best interests, and the customer must be told to notify lenders. CONC 8.6.2R requires a warning about the consequences of missed or reduced payments. CONC 8.6.5R requires the firm to tell the customer if the approach is not working in their interests, and CONC 8.6.6G gives the example of considering advice to leave a plan where a lender will not stop charging interest.
Transparency and holds. CONC 8.2.5R requires transparent communications with lenders, and CONC 8.2.6R requires lenders to be told promptly if payments will be paused or retained.
Consumer Duty. The Consumer Duty expects firms to monitor outcomes, and the FCA's good-practice page says firms remain responsible for outsourced AI.
Illustrative scenario: a firm migrates plan payments to a new automated system. A mapping error sends one creditor's share to the wrong account reference for a group of plans. The system records the payments as made, so no alert is raised. Several months later creditors report arrears, default notices have been issued, and customers complain.
Other common failure points include:
Because plans run for years, a fault can affect a large book before it is found.
A claim that the firm negligently administered a plan, causing loss such as default charges, may fall under PI subject to the wording and excess. Losses of money held for customers, whether through error or fraud, are often treated differently: some PI wordings limit or exclude them and crime or fidelity cover may be relevant. Where many plans are affected, aggregation and remediation costs become important. Debt advice PI is voluntary, so check the wording; see does PI cover AI errors in debt advice and PI for consumer credit firms.
Apex arranges PI for debt management firms and can explain how your policy treats administration errors and losses of money held for customers. See the AI in debt advice hub.
CONC 8.8.1R(9) requires adequate records relating to each plan until the contract is completed or terminated. An automated system should show what was received, what was paid to each creditor and when, and any advice given at review.
A review that concludes a plan remains suitable is a judgement about the customer's best interests. Automation can collect updated information, but where circumstances change, arrears appear or charges continue, an adviser should look at the case.
CONC 8.6.5R requires the firm to tell the customer if the chosen approach is not working in their interests, and CONC 8.6.6G gives continuing interest as an example where leaving the plan should be considered. Automated monitoring should flag these cases for an adviser.
It depends on the wording. A negligent error causing the customer loss may fall within PI, but losses of money held for customers are often limited or excluded and may need other cover. Ask your broker how your programme treats both.
Tell us about your firm and the work you do. A broker will review how your current PI treats AI-assisted work, or arrange new cover. No fee for a quote. Or call 0117 325 0027.
Start a PI quote Request a callbackApex Insurance Brokers Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Registered in England and Wales, company number 07014570. This page is general information about how AI is used in the profession and how insurance may respond. It is not legal, regulatory or insurance advice on your circumstances, and it does not guarantee that cover will be available or on what terms.
