FCA authorised · FRN 724952 0117 325 0027Quote & buy →
Aipedia: Event and wedding planners
A chatbot on a planner's website speaks for the planner, so prices, dates and inclusions it gives a couple may bind the planner if the couple relies on them. Enquiry chatbots run around the clock, often without anyone checking what they say.
Part of: AI in Event and wedding planners
In short
Planners use AI chatbots to answer enquiries, quote packages, check dates and collect leads. The risk is a chatbot that quotes an old price, confirms a date that is taken or promises inclusions the planner does not offer. Under section 50 of the Consumer Rights Act 2015, what is said by or on behalf of a trader can become a contract term if the consumer relies on it, and CMA207 covers misleading statements. Chatbots also collect personal data. PI may respond to negligence claims, while dedicated chatbot liability cover is worth considering.
Couples often research late in the evening, so planners use chatbots to respond instantly. Typical tasks include:
Generative chatbots fill gaps with plausible answers. Unless tightly limited, they can invent discounts, confirm dates or describe services that the planner does not provide.
Under section 50 of the Consumer Rights Act 2015, anything said or written to a consumer by or on behalf of the trader about the trader or the service is treated as a contract term if the consumer takes it into account when deciding to enter the contract or making later decisions. A chatbot on the planner's website is acting on the planner's behalf. The service itself must be performed with reasonable care and skill under section 49.
Misleading statements about price, availability or what is included can also be misleading actions, as explained in the CMA's unfair commercial practices guidance (CMA207). Corporate clients are not consumers, but a chatbot's statements may still be relied on in negotiations. More detail is in the rules on AI for event planners explained.
Chatbots gather names, contact details, dates and sometimes health or accessibility information. The ICO's AI guidance applies. Tell users they are talking to an automated system, explain how their data is used, and avoid asking for health information in an open chat. If a chatbot ever automatically refused bookings, UK GDPR Articles 22A to 22D on automated decisions, in force since 5 February 2026, could apply. See AI guest lists, RSVPs and dietary data.
Illustrative scenario. A couple asks a planner's website chatbot about full wedding planning for a date the following summer. The chatbot, drawing on an old price list, quotes a lower fee, says the date is available and states that a venue styling service is included. The couple books a venue on the strength of the conversation. When the planner sends the contract, the fee is higher, the planner is already committed on that date and styling is extra. The couple says the chatbot's statements formed part of the deal and claims their lost venue deposit.
A claim that a planner's chatbot gave wrong information that a client relied on may be treated as a professional negligence claim, and PI may respond subject to the wording. Some wordings are less clear where the dispute is about the planner refusing to honour a price, which is closer to a contract dispute, or where liability arises from a promise rather than a failure of care; see contractual liability in PI. Regulatory fines are generally excluded.
Because chatbot risks sit between PI, cyber and general liability, some businesses look at dedicated cover. Apex explains the options in AI chatbot insurance, and the PI position in does event planners' PI cover AI mistakes.
A planner can keep an enquiry chatbot useful without letting it make promises:
Apex arranges PI for event and wedding planners, and a broker can look at how your PI and other policies treat chatbot statements. See AI in event and wedding planning and AI-built event budgets and client quotes.
It can be. Under section 50 of the Consumer Rights Act 2015, what is said on a trader's behalf can become a contract term if a consumer relies on it when deciding to enter the contract. Clear statements that quotes are indicative help, but they may not override a specific promise.
There is no planner-specific rule, but being open about automation supports transparency under data protection law and avoids misleading couples. A short statement at the start of the chat is simple and sensible.
PI may respond where a client claims negligent information from the chatbot caused a loss, subject to the wording. Disputes about honouring a quoted price, contractual promises and regulatory fines are often treated differently, so check your wording.
It is safer not to. Confirming availability and taking money are the points where a chatbot error turns into a firm commitment, and they are also targets for fraud. Hand these steps to a person who can check the diary, issue the contract and confirm payment details.
Tell us about your firm and the work you do. A broker will review how your current PI treats AI-assisted work, or arrange new cover. No fee for a quote. Or call 0117 325 0027.
Start a PI quote Request a callbackApex Insurance Brokers Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Registered in England and Wales, company number 07014570. This page is general information about how AI is used in the profession and how insurance may respond. It is not legal, regulatory or insurance advice on your circumstances, and it does not guarantee that cover will be available or on what terms.
