Discretionary vs advisory FCA permissions — what it means for your PII
IFAs with discretionary permissions carry different PI risk to those with advisory-only permissions. Insurers price this in materially. Apex works across 10 principal PI specialisms, with a separate page on how we handle IFA professional indemnity.
The permission distinction
Advisory-only IFAs recommend investment actions; the client executes.
Discretionary IFAs execute investment actions on client behalf without needing per-transaction approval.
Both operate under FCA COBS but the claim patterns differ.
PII cost impact
Discretionary firms typically pay higher PI premiums by 25-40% for the same fee income — more claim exposure per pound of fees.
The premium delta narrows for smaller books with straightforward mandates.
Consumer Duty (PRIN 2A) applies equally — the standard of care is the same in either model.
Cover considerations
- Aggregate limits matter more with discretionary permissions.
- Retroactive date should cover the earliest discretionary trade.
- Sub-limits for cyber and social engineering are increasingly important.
- Consider FOS jurisdiction: consumer discretionary claims can reach FOS.
Frequently asked
Are discretionary permissions harder to insure?
Can a firm hold both permissions?
Does Consumer Duty change PI needs?
What about DFM (discretionary fund management)?
Are AR firms affected?
Does restricted vs independent affect PI?
Related
- IFAs PI insurance UK guide 2026
- FCA COBS 9 suitability framework
- Consumer Duty PRIN 2A for professional firms
