PI insurance for LLPs and partnerships — UK 2026
LLPs and traditional partnerships face materially different liability profiles. Cover needs to reflect the structure, not just the profession.
The structural difference
Traditional partnership: partners are jointly and severally liable for the firm's debts and negligence — personal assets exposed.
LLP (Limited Liability Partnership under LLPA 2000): partners have limited liability for firm's debts — personal assets protected from most claims.
Both need PI — the structure affects how claims flow to individuals but not whether PI is needed.
How PI responds
Firm's PI responds to negligence claims against the firm.
For traditional partnerships, adequate PI is critical — the firm and partners' personal assets are all in the pot.
For LLPs, PI still matters but the personal-asset risk is lower.
SRA MTC and other regulated frameworks apply regardless of structure.
Cover levels
Regulated professions (solicitors, accountants, architects): sector minimum applies to both LLP and partnership.
Turnover-based scaling (ICAEW 2.5× fees, RICS turnover scale) applies regardless of structure.
LLPs and partnerships often carry higher limits than sole traders — reflecting bigger books and more complex work.
Partner-level considerations
- New partners joining should verify the retroactive date covers earliest historic exposure.
- Departing partners in traditional partnerships need run-off arrangements agreed at exit.
- LLP members leaving are less exposed but still benefit from run-off protection.
- Successor practice rules matter for solicitor LLPs and partnerships — see SRA guidance.
Frequently asked
Is PI different for LLPs vs partnerships?
Do all partners need to be named?
What happens to PI when a partner leaves?
Can partners have their own PI?
Does the LLP or partnership need D&O?
What if we convert LLP to Ltd?
Related
- PI insurance for limited companies UK 2026
- Solicitor successor practice SRA MTC
- Retiring partner PI liability UK 2026
