FCA authorised · FRN 7249520117 325 0027Quote & buy →
Apex Insurance Brokers
Speak to a brokerGet a quote →
APEX INSURANCE
PI insurance explained

What is the duty of fair presentation of risk under the Insurance Act 2015?

Reviewed by Matthew Bartlett, Director, Apex Insurance Brokers Limited · Last reviewed 2026-08-05

In short: The Insurance Act 2015 requires every commercial (non-consumer) insured to make a "fair presentation of the risk" before a policy starts or renews. You must disclose every material circumstance you know or ought to know, in a clear and accessible way. If you breach this duty, the insurer has remedies that can range from a reduced claim payment to voiding the policy entirely.

If you buy professional indemnity or any other commercial insurance in the UK, the duty of fair presentation is the single most important obligation you have before cover begins. It governs what you must tell your insurer about your business and your risks. Getting it right protects your claims; getting it wrong can leave you with reduced cover, or none at all, precisely when you need to rely on the policy.

Where the duty comes from

The duty of fair presentation is set out in section 3 of the Insurance Act 2015. The Act received Royal Assent in 2015 and came into force on 12 August 2016. It applies to non-consumer insurance contracts — that is, contracts taken out wholly or mainly for purposes related to a trade, business or profession.

Before the Act, commercial insurance was governed largely by the older duty of disclosure under the Marine Insurance Act 1906 and the doctrine of "utmost good faith". That regime was widely seen as harsh: an innocent, immaterial-looking omission could allow an insurer to avoid the whole policy. The Insurance Act 2015 replaced that with the more balanced framework of fair presentation and proportionate remedies. Consumer policies are governed separately, by the Consumer Insurance (Disclosure and Representations) Act 2012.

What a "fair presentation" actually requires

Under section 3, a fair presentation of the risk has three components. You must:

The duty is reciprocal in spirit: it rewards a genuine, structured disclosure and no longer expects you to guess at every conceivable fact an underwriter might one day wish you had mentioned.

What counts as a "material circumstance"?

Section 7 of the Act defines this. A circumstance is material if it would influence the judgement of a prudent insurer in deciding whether to take on the risk and, if so, on what terms. Examples of things that are commonly material for a professional indemnity risk include:

The Act also lists things that need not be disclosed unless the insurer asks, such as circumstances that diminish the risk, matters the insurer already knows or ought to know, and matters the insurer waives.

Not sure what your insurer will treat as material? Talk it through with Apex before you complete a proposal →

"Know or ought to know" — whose knowledge counts?

Section 4 explains what your business is treated as knowing. For an organisation, this covers what is known to senior management and to those responsible for arranging the insurance (including your broker). It also includes what you ought to know — what a reasonable search of information available to you would reveal, whether held within your business or by others, such as agents holding relevant information.

This "reasonable search" standard matters. You cannot deliberately compartmentalise information to avoid disclosing it. Equally, the Act recognises you cannot be expected to know everything held by every individual across a large organisation. Section 5 addresses the insurer's own knowledge, so a fact the insurer already knows, ought to know, or is presumed to know does not need to be disclosed.

Consequences of breach: the proportionate remedies

If you fail to make a fair presentation, the insurer's remedies depend on the nature of the breach. This is the Act's most significant reform, set out in section 8 and Schedule 1. The remedy hinges on whether the breach was deliberate or reckless, and on what the insurer would have done had a fair presentation been made.

Deliberate or reckless breach

If the insurer shows the breach was deliberate or reckless, it may avoid the contract, refuse all claims, and keep the premiums paid. This is the most severe outcome and is reserved for the most serious conduct.

Neither deliberate nor reckless

Where the breach is innocent or careless (not deliberate or reckless), the remedy is proportionate and depends on what the insurer would have done with a fair presentation:

So a business that innocently under-declares and would have paid, say, a premium 20% higher, would typically see a claim settlement reduced accordingly, rather than losing cover altogether. That proportionate approach is a marked improvement on the old "all or nothing" position.

Old law vs the Insurance Act 2015

The practical difference between the two regimes is stark:

Pre-2016 (Marine Insurance Act 1906) Insurance Act 2015
Duty of disclosure and utmost good faith Duty of fair presentation of the risk
Any material non-disclosure could void the whole policy Proportionate remedies based on the breach and the insurer's likely response
Little credit for good-faith, structured disclosure Rewards clear, accessible presentation; "data dumps" not enough
Avoidance for innocent errors Avoidance reserved for deliberate or reckless breach

Can insurers contract out of the Act?

For non-consumer contracts, the Act allows parties to agree different terms — a "disadvantageous term" that puts the insured in a worse position than the Act's default. But under Part 5 (sections 16 and 17), any such term is only effective if the insurer meets transparency requirements: it must take sufficient steps to draw the term to your attention before the contract is entered into, and the term must be clear and unambiguous as to its effect. This is one reason it pays to have a broker review policy wordings rather than accept them at face value.

Practical steps to make a fair presentation

Common questions

Does the duty of fair presentation apply to renewals?

Yes. A renewal is a new contract of insurance, so the duty applies afresh each time you renew, as well as at inception and often when you make a mid-term variation.

What is the difference between a deliberate breach and a careless one?

A breach is deliberate or reckless if the insured knew it was in breach of the duty, or did not care whether it was. Anything falling short of that — an honest mistake or careless omission — is treated as neither deliberate nor reckless, which triggers the proportionate remedies rather than outright avoidance. The insurer bears the burden of proving a deliberate or reckless breach.

Does using a broker satisfy the duty for me?

A broker helps you present the risk well and knows what insurers treat as material, but the duty remains yours. Importantly, your broker's knowledge can be attributed to you under section 4, so it is essential to give your broker complete and accurate information.

Need cover, or just want it explained by a person? Apex places PI for UK professionals.

Get a PI quote →

Apex Insurance Brokers Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FRN 724952). This guide is general information, not advice on a specific policy or a substitute for reading your policy wording.

Get a quote →