FCA authorised · FRN 724952 0117 325 0027Quote & buy →
Aipedia: Debt advice firms
Debt firms can offer AI chatbots and self-serve tools, but a bot answering a customer's question about their debts may be giving regulated advice, with all of CONC 8 attached. Many users are vulnerable, so a confident wrong answer can do real harm.
Part of: AI in Debt advice firms
In short
Chatbots and self-serve journeys promise help at any hour and at scale. MaPS-funded research for the Money Advice Liaison Group, reported in April 2026, concluded that widespread vulnerability and a public trust gap mean self-serve AI cannot simply be switched on, and proposed a Safe-Use Framework. Debt management firms must still tell customers that free debt counselling is available and link to MoneyHelper under CONC 8.2.4R. Where a bot moves from general information to a personal recommendation, the suitability and full-assessment rules in CONC 8.3.2R apply, and the firm is responsible for what it says.
Self-serve tools range from simple scripted chat that answers common questions, through guided budgeting journeys, to generative AI chatbots that respond in natural language to whatever a customer types. Free-to-client agencies see them as a way to reach people outside opening hours and reduce queues; fee-charging firms use them to capture and qualify enquiries.
The sector is cautious. Research by the Money Advice Liaison Group with Wyser, funded by MaPS and reported in April 2026, said generative AI could reshape regulated debt advice only with "precision, humility and human oversight". It found that widespread vulnerability and a public trust gap mean self-serve AI cannot simply be switched on, and proposed a Safe-Use Framework with a three-level Debt Advice AI Roadmap. The FCA and CMA also commissioned research on how consumers use generative AI, including for debt advice.
Guidance or advice. General information about how debt solutions work is different from a recommendation about what a particular customer should do. Once a bot takes in someone's circumstances and points them to a solution, the firm should assume the CONC 8 advice rules apply.
Suitability and assessment. CONC 8.3.2R requires suitable advice based on a sufficiently full assessment of the customer's financial circumstances. A short chat rarely gets there.
Free advice signposting. CONC 8.2.4R requires a debt management firm to tell customers prominently, in its first communication, that free debt counselling is available, and to point them to MoneyHelper. A chatbot that is the first point of contact needs to do this.
Vulnerability and the Consumer Duty. CONC 8.2.7R requires effective procedures to identify particularly vulnerable customers, and the FCA's good-practice page expects a non-AI route for vulnerable customers and testing of outcomes across consumer characteristics.
Illustrative scenario: a customer asks a firm's chatbot whether they can stop paying a credit card to cover rent arrears. The bot gives a confident general answer drawn from rules in another part of the UK and does not ask about priority debts. The customer acts on it, a creditor issues proceedings, and the customer complains that the firm told them what to do.
Other common failure points include:
A firm is usually responsible for what its chatbot tells customers, in the same way as for anything else it publishes. If a customer suffers loss and claims, PI may respond, subject to the wording and any technology or AI exclusions; some policies limit cover for automated services, so check. Because debt advice PI is voluntary, the wording decides. See AI chatbot insurance and does PI cover AI errors in debt advice.
Apex arranges PI for debt advice firms and can check how your wording treats advice delivered through automated channels. See the AI in debt advice hub.
It depends on what it does. General information is unlikely to be advice, but a bot that takes in a customer's circumstances and recommends a course of action is likely to be treated as debt counselling, so CONC 8 applies in full.
For debt management firms, CONC 8.2.4R requires a prominent statement in the first communication that free debt counselling is available, with a pointer to MoneyHelper. If the bot is the first contact, it should give that statement.
Usually the firm, as with anything else it tells customers. The FCA says firms remain responsible for outcomes, including where AI is supplied by a third party. Whether PI responds to a resulting claim depends on the wording and any technology or automated service exclusions.
The rules do not ban it, but MaPS-funded MALG research concluded self-serve AI cannot simply be switched on given widespread vulnerability. The FCA expects a non-AI route for vulnerable customers, and the full assessment and suitability duties still apply.
Tell us about your firm and the work you do. A broker will review how your current PI treats AI-assisted work, or arrange new cover. No fee for a quote. Or call 0117 325 0027.
Start a PI quote Request a callbackApex Insurance Brokers Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Registered in England and Wales, company number 07014570. This page is general information about how AI is used in the profession and how insurance may respond. It is not legal, regulatory or insurance advice on your circumstances, and it does not guarantee that cover will be available or on what terms.
