FCA authorised · FRN 724952 0117 325 0027Quote & buy →
Aipedia: Debt advice firms
AI can write debt adverts and score leads, but CONC 8.9 still makes the firm check every lead generator it uses. Acting on misleadingly obtained leads is likely to breach the Principles and the Consumer Duty, and the main exposure here is regulatory, which PI commonly does not cover.
Part of: AI in Debt advice firms
In short
Generative AI produces ad copy, landing pages and comparison funnels at speed, and scoring models decide which enquiries get called back. CONC 8.9.1G says acting on leads the firm knows or ought to know were obtained through misleading practices is likely to breach Principles 6 and 7 and the Consumer Duty. CONC 8.9.2R requires checks on a lead generator's advice, website, advertising and practices before accepting leads, and CONC 8.9.4R requires ongoing steps. The debt packager remuneration ban from CONC 8.3.9R limits payments for referrals. Regulatory action, fines and redress are commonly outside PI.
Debt marketing has always been competitive and volume-driven. AI may be used to:
Lead generators and comparison sites may use the same tools on the firm's behalf, often with little visibility of which version of an advert a customer actually saw. That makes monitoring harder just as the volume of material grows.
Each of these can drift into problems. Optimised copy can overstate what a solution does. A funnel that "suggests" a solution can look like advice. A scoring model that prioritises high-value leads can steer resources away from people who most need help.
Lead generators. In CONC 8.9, 8.9.1G says Principles 6 and 7 and the Consumer Duty apply to a firm dealing with customers referred by a lead generator, and acting on leads the firm knows or ought to know were obtained through misleading practices is likely to breach them. CONC 8.9.2R requires the firm, before accepting leads, to take reasonable steps to check the generator's advice, website, advertising and commercial practices comply with the law, including the DMCCA, and that it is registered with the ICO with data protection and PECR processes. CONC 8.9.4R requires reasonable steps to ensure the generator does not carry on or claim to provide debt counselling or debt adjusting without permission.
Remuneration. CONC 8.3.9R to 8.3.17G prohibit debt packager remuneration, and CONC 8.3.6G says incentives should not undermine suitable advice.
History. The FCA's 2018 Dear CEO letter to debt packagers, now marked historical, raised clear promotions and referral-fee conflicts that biased advice towards IVAs. CONC 8.2.4R also requires debt management firms to tell customers about free debt counselling at first contact.
Illustrative scenario: a firm accepts leads from a partner that uses AI-generated adverts promising to "write off" most debts. The firm checked the partner's website once but did not review the new campaigns. Customers arrive expecting an outcome no adviser can promise. Complaints follow and the FCA asks how the firm monitored its lead sources.
Other common failure points include:
PI is designed for civil liability to clients and third parties for negligent professional services. FCA fines are commonly uninsurable or excluded, and the cost of a regulator-required redress exercise is often outside cover, depending on the wording. Some policies offer limited cover for the cost of responding to an investigation. See the fines and penalties exclusion and regulatory investigation costs cover. Where a customer brings a civil claim for loss caused by advice they received after a misleading promotion, PI may respond subject to the wording.
Apex arranges PI for debt advice firms and can explain where regulatory costs sit in your programme. See the AI in debt advice hub.
CONC 8.9 requires reasonable checks on a lead generator's advertising and practices before and after accepting leads, and acting on leads you ought to know were misleadingly obtained is likely to breach the Principles and the Consumer Duty. In practice you need to monitor what partners publish.
CONC 8.3.9R to 8.3.17G prohibit debt packager remuneration, and CONC 8.3.6G says incentives should not undermine suitable advice. The detail matters, so check any lead arrangement against the rules before it starts.
A funnel that takes in a customer's circumstances and points them to a solution may be giving debt counselling, which needs permission and engages CONC 8.3.2R on suitability and a full assessment. Keeping funnels to information and handing recommendations to an adviser is the safer design.
Usually not. Fines are commonly uninsurable or excluded, and regulator-led redress is often outside cover. Some wordings include limited investigation costs cover. Civil claims for loss may be treated differently, subject to the wording.
Tell us about your firm and the work you do. A broker will review how your current PI treats AI-assisted work, or arrange new cover. No fee for a quote. Or call 0117 325 0027.
Start a PI quote Request a callbackApex Insurance Brokers Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Registered in England and Wales, company number 07014570. This page is general information about how AI is used in the profession and how insurance may respond. It is not legal, regulatory or insurance advice on your circumstances, and it does not guarantee that cover will be available or on what terms.
