Aipedia: Mortgage brokers
There are no AI-specific FCA rules for mortgage brokers; existing rules apply, and FS25/6 expects qualified advisers to stay in charge of AI-assisted recommendations. Brokers who understand the published material can show the FCA, the Ombudsman and their PI insurer how they control AI.
Part of: AI in Mortgage brokers
In short
The FCA regulates AI use by mortgage brokers through its existing rules rather than new ones. FS25/6 (December 2025) is the most mortgage-specific statement: respondents wanted AI to support advisers, with qualified people reviewing and signing off AI-based recommendations, and the FCA said the Consumer Duty and SM&CR already manage many risks. PS25/11 (July 2025) relaxed some mortgage rules but says nothing about AI. The FCA's 2026 good practice review stresses accountability for outsourced AI and auditable records. Any disclosure consultation for digital journeys is expected in 2027.
The FCA treats AI as a way of doing regulated work, not as a separate activity. Its "AI and the FCA: our approach" page (8 September 2025, updated 2 October 2026) states: "We do not plan to introduce extra regulations for AI." The approach is principles-based and outcomes-focused. For a mortgage broker, that means the same MCOB, PRIN, SYSC and SM&CR obligations apply whether a recommendation was researched by an adviser, a sourcing system or a generative AI model.
| Publication | Date | Status | Key points for brokers |
|---|---|---|---|
| FS25/6 Mortgage Rule Review feedback and roadmap | December 2025 | Feedback and roadmap, not rules | AI should improve advice, not replace advisers; human judgement essential in complex cases; calls for adviser sign-off of AI recommendations; Consumer Duty and SM&CR already manage many risks |
| PS25/11 | Published and in force 22 July 2025 | Binding rule changes | Easier to discuss options without full advice, remortgage with a new lender and reduce terms; no AI content |
| FCA AI Update | 22 April 2024 | Explanation of existing rules | Maps AI to Principles 2, 3, 6, 7, 8 and 9, PRIN 2A, SYSC 4, 7, 8 and 15A, SM&CR, DISP 1 and FG22/5 |
| AI in financial services: good practice | 19 October 2026 | Good practice, no new requirements | Firms remain responsible for outcomes and outsourced AI; map AI to senior managers; keep auditable decision records; test outcomes across customer groups; offer non-AI routes |
| Mills Review | 6 July 2026 | Recommendations to the FCA Board | Seven recommendations on AI in retail financial services, including the perimeter, autonomous models, agentic finance and AI Lab expansion |
FS25/6 summarises feedback to DP25/2 and sets the roadmap for the Mortgage Rule Review. On AI, the points that matter most to brokers are:
PS25/11 contains no AI content, but its changes make execution-only and lighter-touch journeys more practical, for example discussing options without full advice and remortgaging with a new lender. Those journeys are the ones most likely to be automated. A broker building an automated retention or remortgage process still needs it to meet the Consumer Duty, and the 2026 review flags "inflexible automated journeys" as an area for improvement. See AI for product transfers.
The Treasury Committee report "Artificial intelligence in financial services" (HC 684, 20 January 2026) reportedly asked the FCA for practical AI guidance by the end of 2026, including on accountability for AI harm; responses were published in April 2026. The Financial Ombudsman Service told the Mills Review it sees very few complaints about firms' use of AI but wants a clear rationale for how AI contributed to an outcome. Further FCA work on holistic advice and AI is also on the roadmap.
The FCA has said nothing specific about AI and PI. MIPRU 3.2 still requires mortgage intermediaries to hold PI with minimum terms, including cover for appointed representatives' conduct, defence costs and Ombudsman awards. Insurers may ask how AI is governed, and FS25/6's emphasis on adviser sign-off is a useful benchmark for answering. The full PI rules are explained on FCA PI requirements for mortgage brokers, and the AI question is covered in does broker PI cover AI mistakes. Return to the mortgage broker AI hub for other guides.
Apex arranges PI for mortgage brokers and can review how your wording and proposal answers reflect the AI governance described above.
No. FS25/6 is a feedback statement and roadmap. It records what respondents said about AI and sets out the FCA's next steps. The binding obligations remain the existing Handbook rules, such as the Consumer Duty, the conduct rules and the MCOB advice rules.
There is no specific rule saying so. Respondents to DP25/2 asked for qualified advisers to review and sign off AI-based recommendations, and the conduct rules and suitability requirements make adviser review the safest approach in practice.
There is no current FCA rule requiring brokers to disclose AI use as such. FS25/6 says disclosure and financial promotion changes for digital journeys will be explored, with any consultation expected in 2027. Data protection law already requires transparency about some processing.
It covers financial services firms generally rather than mortgage brokers specifically, and it does not create new requirements. Its themes, such as accountability for outsourced AI, auditable records and non-AI routes for vulnerable customers, are a useful checklist for any broker.
Tell us about your firm and the work you do. A broker will review how your current PI treats AI-assisted work, or arrange new cover. No fee for a quote. Or call 0117 325 0027.
Start a PI quote Request a callbackApex Insurance Brokers Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Registered in England and Wales, company number 07014570. This page is general information about how AI is used in the profession and how insurance may respond. It is not legal, regulatory or insurance advice on your circumstances, and it does not guarantee that cover will be available or on what terms.