FCA authorised · FRN 724952 0117 325 0027Quote & buy →
Aipedia: Wealth managers and discretionary fund managers
PI usually covers wealth managers' AI errors in the same way as other professional errors, where the wording is silent on AI and subject to its terms. Whether PI is compulsory, and on what terms, depends on the firm's prudential category.
Part of: AI in Wealth managers and discretionary fund managers
In short
Personal investment firms must hold PI under IPRU-INV 13.1.5R, collective portfolio management firms face a PII capital requirement under IPRU-INV 11, and most discretionary managers are MIFIDPRU firms that should check their permissions, though many may hold PI for commercial reasons. Silent policies usually treat AI-caused errors like any other professional error, subject to the wording. Watch for AI exclusions and conditions, and test how the aggregation clause and limit respond to one model error affecting many clients. Fines, fee refunds and market losses are usually outside cover.
Whether a wealth manager must hold PI, and on what terms, depends on how it is classified. The difference between advisory and discretionary permissions is explained in discretionary versus advisory permissions and PII.
| Firm type | PI position |
|---|---|
| Personal investment firm (advisory or arranging, no MiFID discretionary business) | Must hold PI under IPRU-INV 13.1.5R, with minimum limits in 13.1.10R and 13.1.13R. Excluding past or current business lines requires additional capital under 13.1.21R and 13.1.23R. |
| Collective portfolio management firm (AIFM or CPMI) | Must hold PII or additional own funds under the PII capital requirement in IPRU-INV 11, which replicates Article 15 of the AIFMD Level 2 regulation in 11.3.15; exclusions are dealt with in 11.3.16R. |
| MIFIDPRU investment firm (most discretionary managers since 1 January 2022) | Capital is set by own funds rules. Check the Handbook and your permissions for any PI requirement; many firms may hold PI because clients, platforms and acquirers expect it. |
No FCA statement specifically on AI and PI for wealth managers has been found. The category matters for AI because it decides whether the FCA sets minimum terms for the policy. Where PI is required by rule, exclusions and limits have regulatory as well as commercial consequences. Where it is commercially driven, the terms are a matter of negotiation, and clients, platforms or acquirers may set their own expectations.
Many PI wordings may say nothing about AI. Where cover is triggered by a claim arising from professional services, an error made with an AI tool is usually treated like any other error, subject to the policy terms, limit and excess. That is often called silent AI cover.
Some insurers may introduce explicit wording: exclusions for losses arising from AI, conditions requiring human review of AI outputs, or affirmative cover that confirms AI-assisted services are included. For IPRU-INV 13 firms, any exclusion of a business line has capital consequences, so an AI exclusion needs careful review. See affirmative AI cover versus silent AI and does PI cover AI mistakes.
A discretionary firm's AI errors tend to be systemic: one rebalancing parameter, one model portfolio decision or one report template affects many clients. The aggregation clause decides whether those claims are one claim or many. Broad aggregation can mean a single excess but also a single limit for the whole event; narrow aggregation means an excess on each claim. Neither is always better. A firm running large model portfolio services or automated rebalancing should test its limit against a book-wide error. More detail is in aggregation of claims.
Under the Insurance Act 2015 the firm must make a fair presentation of the risk; see the material circumstance test. For AI, that usually means describing:
Practical record keeping is covered in what to document about AI use. If you find an error that could affect many clients, consider notifying a circumstance promptly.
Apex arranges PI for wealth managers and discretionary fund managers. A broker can review whether your prudential category requires PI, how your policy treats AI-assisted portfolio management, and whether the limit and aggregation clause fit a systemic error. See AI in wealth management.
Most discretionary managers are MIFIDPRU firms with capital set by own funds rules. Check the Handbook and your permissions for any PI requirement. Many may hold PI anyway because clients, platforms and acquirers expect it.
Usually, where the claim arises from professional services and nothing in the wording excludes AI, subject to the policy terms, limit and excess. Check for new AI exclusions or conditions at each renewal.
For personal investment firms under IPRU-INV 13, excluding past or current business lines can require additional capital under 13.1.21R and 13.1.23R. Check with your compliance adviser before accepting any exclusion that could narrow cover for regulated activities.
It depends on the aggregation clause. Some wordings treat claims from a single cause as one claim, with one excess and one limit; others do not. Test your limit against a book-wide error scenario.
Tell us about your firm and the work you do. A broker will review how your current PI treats AI-assisted work, or arrange new cover. No fee for a quote. Or call 0117 325 0027.
Start a PI quote Request a callbackApex Insurance Brokers Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Registered in England and Wales, company number 07014570. This page is general information about how AI is used in the profession and how insurance may respond. It is not legal, regulatory or insurance advice on your circumstances, and it does not guarantee that cover will be available or on what terms.
