A mid-sized residential block management firm in the South West manages a portfolio of around 90 blocks, including a 24-storey mixed-use tower designated as a higher-risk building under the Building Safety Act 2022. A leaseholder in the tower brings an application to the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) under section 27A of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 challenging four years of service charge demands. The challenge alleges that consultation under section 20 was not properly carried out before a £680,000 lift replacement, that buildings insurance commission was not disclosed, and that reserve fund contributions were mis-allocated across two schedules of accounts. The Tribunal disallows £312,000 of the lift cost as irrecoverable, orders repayment of £41,000 of insurance commission, and the freeholder turns to the managing agent for the shortfall. The agent's professional indemnity insurer is on notice within 48 hours.
That sequence — a leaseholder challenge under section 27A, a Tribunal determination capping recoverable expenditure, and a downstream PI claim from the freeholder or RTM company for the irrecoverable balance — is the recurring pattern at the heart of block management PI in 2026. Whether the agent's Professional Indemnity Insurance responds, and on what terms, depends on the cover in force when the matter was notified, the wording of that policy, what the management agreement said, what consents the agent had on file, and what run-off was maintained when the contract ended.
This guide is for directors, principals and senior managers at UK residential and mixed-use property management firms — block managers, managing agents, build-to-rent operators, mixed-use estate managers and the multi-disciplinary practices that combine block management with letting and asset management. It explains what Professional Indemnity Insurance is doing for a property management firm in 2026, what the codes and the statutory framework expect, and where the decisions at renewal genuinely matter.
What Professional Indemnity Insurance covers for property managers
Professional Indemnity Insurance — usually written as PI or PII — pays the legal costs of defending a civil claim brought against your firm by a client (the freeholder, head lessee, Right to Manage company or resident management company) or a third party (a leaseholder, tenant, contractor or visitor) who says they have suffered financial loss as a result of your professional services as a property manager. It pays any damages or settlement awarded against the firm up to the limit of indemnity. Property managers' PI is written on a claims-made basis: the policy that responds is the one in force when the claim or circumstance is first notified, not the policy in force when the work was done. Continuity of cover, retroactive dates and run-off are therefore central to whether a claim is ever paid.
For a property management business, "professional services" is a broad envelope. It covers the day-to-day administration of buildings under a management agreement — service charge budgeting and demands, contractor procurement and supervision, repair and maintenance instructions, statutory consultations, insurance arrangement and broking, health-and-safety compliance, fire-safety duties, the management of major works programmes, dealing with leaseholder correspondence and disputes, attendance at residents' meetings, and the production and audit-support of year-end service charge accounts. It extends to the firm's role as a duty-holder under the Building Safety Act 2022 where the agent is engaged by, or operates as, an accountable person or principal accountable person.
The product does not cover the firm's own fee disputes (in most policies), regulatory fines or penalties imposed by the Financial Conduct Authority or other regulators, dishonest or fraudulent conduct (which is the territory of Client Money Protection and Fidelity cover), the cost of remedying defective building works that the agent did not carry out, or — critically — contractually-assumed liabilities that go beyond the duty of reasonable skill and care. PI sits alongside, not in place of, the firm's Client Money Protection cover, its Crime/Fidelity policy, and the buildings and terrorism insurance arranged on each block.
The regulatory and professional backdrop
Unlike solicitors (SRA) or financial advisers (FCA-authorised firms), there is no single statutory regulator that mandates Professional Indemnity Insurance as a condition of practising as a residential property manager. The framework is layered — voluntary professional bodies, statutory duties under leasehold and building safety legislation, contractual requirements imposed by clients and lenders, and consumer-protection obligations under the Tenant Fees Act 2019 and the Money Laundering Regulations 2017. A property manager's PI obligations sit across all of those.
The Property Institute (TPI) is the principal professional body for the sector. It was formed in October 2023 from the merger of the Association of Residential Managing Agents (ARMA) and the Institute of Residential Property Management (IRPM), and now sets the TPI Code of Practice for member firms, runs the qualification framework, and operates the membership designations Associate (AssocTPI), Member (MTPI) and Fellow (FTPI). TPI member firms are expected to carry adequate PI cover under the Code; the Code does not publish a single flat minimum figure but requires cover appropriate to the size and nature of the portfolio. Propertymark is the leading voluntary trade body for residential and commercial sales and lettings agents, and operates a parallel Code with its own PI expectations. A firm that combines block management with letting agency work will commonly sit within both.
The RICS Service Charge Residential Management Code (4th edition) is approved by the Secretary of State under section 87 of the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 and has special status: while compliance is voluntary in the strict legal sense, Tribunals and courts will take a failure to follow it into account when determining whether a service charge cost is reasonable under section 19 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985. For practical purposes the Code is the operating manual for the sector.
The leasehold framework is the substantive law within which property managers operate. The Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 governs service charges (sections 18 to 30B), the section 20 consultation regime for qualifying works and qualifying long-term agreements, the section 21B requirement to provide leaseholders with a summary of their rights and obligations, and the section 27A jurisdiction of the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) to determine payability. The Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 governs the right of first refusal and, at section 42, requires service charge contributions to be held on statutory trust by the landlord or managing agent — the foundation of client money handling in block management. The Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 provides the Right to Manage (RTM) regime. The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 introduced further transparency and ground-rent reforms; where commenced, its provisions affect what can be charged, how it is disclosed, and the standard demand wording.
The Building Safety Act 2022 restructured the safety regime for higher-risk buildings — residential buildings 18 metres or above, or 7 storeys or more, with at least two dwellings. The Act introduces the role of the accountable person and, where there is more than one, the principal accountable person; mandatory registration with the Building Safety Regulator (a unit within the Health and Safety Executive); a duty to prepare and maintain a safety case and safety case report; a residents' engagement strategy; mandatory occurrence reporting; and gateways one to three. Property managers who act as, or for, accountable persons sit at the centre of this regime.
The Fire Safety (England) Regulations 2022 imposed specific duties on the responsible person in multi-occupied residential buildings — monthly checks of lifts used by firefighters in buildings over 18 metres, quarterly checks of fire doors in the common parts of buildings over 11 metres, building information to fire and rescue services, and resident-facing information. Where the agent is the responsible person under the Fire Safety Order, or acts under delegation, those duties are within the PI envelope.
Client money. Client Money Protection (CMP) is mandatory for letting agents under the Tenant Fees Act 2019 and the Client Money Protection Schemes for Property Agents Regulations 2018, and is required by the TPI and Propertymark Codes for member firms more broadly. CMP sits alongside PI: PI covers the firm's professional negligence; CMP covers leaseholder and client money lost through theft, fraud or insolvency.
What property managers' PI actually covers — the wording detail
A standard UK property managers' PI policy covers civil liability arising from breach of professional duty by the insured. Two policies that look similar at headline level can respond very differently; the wording variables that matter most are the following.
The definition of professional services. Some policies define activities by reference to a scheduled list — "residential block management", "managing agent services", "service charge administration", "estate management". Others use an open definition referencing "the professional activities of a property manager". For firms that combine block management with letting, asset management, commercial property management, build-to-rent operation or facilities management, the schedule should be checked against the actual mix. A firm whose policy says "residential block management" and which is in fact running a mixed-use tower with retail at ground floor and BTR above is sitting on a wording gap.
The duty of care covered. Policies cover the common-law and contractual duty of reasonable skill and care. Most exclude liability assumed for fitness for purpose, performance guarantees, absolute warranties or any contractual standard that exceeds reasonable skill and care. Management agreements drafted by the freeholder's solicitor will sometimes contain warranty-style obligations the agent would be uninsured to perform — a point to raise on appointment.
The retroactive date. Because the policy is claims-made, the retroactive date controls how far back the policy will reach. "Unlimited" reaches any past work; a date set at, say, 1 January 2018 excludes earlier work. Continuity of retroactive cover across renewals is one of the most important things the broker checks each year — a gap on transfer to a new insurer can leave whole blocks of historical work outside cover.
Defence costs, aggregate caps, exclusions and sub-limits. Most policies pay defence costs within the limit of indemnity, written on an "any one claim" basis with aggregate caps on certain categories — typically cladding-related, fire-safety-related, asbestos, Building Safety Act-related and pollution claims. Buildings insurance broking is sometimes carved out as a separate Investment & Insurance Mediation section. Section 20 consultation disputes, service charge accounting and CMP-related matters are commonly written into the main wording but with notification triggers that the firm needs to be aware of.
Buildings insurance commission and broking. Where the firm broker-arranges buildings insurance for the blocks it manages, the PI policy should explicitly contemplate insurance mediation. Some standard wordings exclude it; others sub-limit it. The FCA expectations on commission disclosure that have tightened since 2024 sit in this part of the wording.
How much cover do you actually need?
The minimum required by your management agreements is rarely the right answer — it is the minimum required for that block. The figure that's right for your firm depends on the size and complexity of the portfolio, the contractual obligations you accept under each management agreement, the cumulative service charge throughput, and the concentration of higher-risk buildings within the book. A useful proxy: take the largest blocks under management, estimate the worst-case financial exposure if a section 20 consultation failed and £250-per-leaseholder cap applied to the works, and ensure the PI limit comfortably exceeds the most exposed single block with headroom for defence costs.
Indicative ranges, with the usual caveat that every firm's profile is different: a small block management practice with a portfolio of fifteen to thirty smaller blocks and no higher-risk buildings may sit at £1m to £2m per claim; a mid-sized firm managing fifty to a hundred and fifty blocks across a regional footprint, with some higher-risk-building exposure, typically sits at £2m to £5m; firms with substantial higher-risk-building portfolios, large mixed-use estates, build-to-rent operation or extensive insurance-broking activity commonly carry £5m to £10m, sometimes higher through project-specific cover for major works programmes.
The shape of the limit matters as well as the headline. An "any one claim" limit with unlimited aggregate is different from "any one claim" with an aggregate cap on certain categories, which is different again from a wholly aggregated policy where one large claim exhausts cover for the year. For a firm exposed to a cluster of related section 20 challenges across multiple blocks under the same management approach, aggregation provisions in the wording can determine whether one limit applies to all or whether each claim attracts its own.
Where claims come from — the recurring patterns
Working from anonymised industry patterns, property managers' PI claims cluster around the following.
Section 20 consultation failures. The recovery cap that applies when consultation is not properly carried out — £250 per leaseholder for qualifying works, £100 per leaseholder per year for qualifying long-term agreements — converts a procedural error into a quantifiable shortfall that the agent ends up paying. The section 20 cluster article explains the regime, the Daejan v Benson dispensation route, and the PI consequences in detail.
Service charge accounting errors. Mis-allocation between schedules, omitted reconciliations, late transfers to reserve funds, failure to account for contractor commissions, errors in apportionment percentages, and year-end accounts that do not match the underlying trial balance. The block management PI and service charge accounting cluster article covers the section 42 trust framework and the recurring patterns.
Buildings insurance broking errors. Under-insurance through outdated reinstatement-cost assessments, failure to declare material risk factors, lapsed terrorism cover on a block where the lease requires it, commission disclosure failures, and the FCA Conduct of Business consequences that sit alongside the civil claim.
Fire safety and Building Safety Act duties. Failure to carry out fire door inspections under the Fire Safety (England) Regulations 2022, omitted lift-for-firefighters checks, gaps in the safety case for higher-risk buildings, late mandatory occurrence reports to the Building Safety Regulator, weaknesses in the residents' engagement strategy.
Health and safety and contractor management. Slips, trips and falls in common parts where the agent's risk assessment is alleged deficient; contractor selection without verified competence; legionella, asbestos and electrical safety regimes where the periodic inspection regime has slipped.
Lease interpretation and rent collection. Demands raised on the wrong leaseholder, percentage apportionments calculated incorrectly, ground rent demands that breach the Leasehold Reform (Ground Rent) Act 2022 cap on new leases, and demands that fail the section 47 and 48 requirements of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 and are therefore unenforceable.
Defence costs on a contested property managers' PI claim typically run from low five-figures on a straightforward section 27A application to mid-six-figures on a multi-block, multi-leaseholder challenge with parallel Tribunal and High Court proceedings. The defence-cost element alone has reshaped how insurers underwrite the class.
Run-off — six years, twelve and beyond
Because PI is written on a claims-made basis, the property management firm that has retired, sold its book or wound down is uninsured for past work the moment the last working policy lapses, unless run-off cover is bought. Run-off is a non-renewing policy that responds to claims notified during its term arising from work done before the firm ceased — bought as a single up-front premium calculated as a multiple of the firm's last working policy premium.
The right run-off period depends on the longest open commitment the firm has. The standard contractual limitation period under English law is six years from the cause of action; where management agreements have been executed as deeds (sometimes the case for larger schemes), the period is twelve years; service charge challenges under section 27A can extend further where the underlying liability is alleged to have crystallised more recently than the original contract. For firms with build-to-rent or mixed-use exposure, the longer limitation periods under the Defective Premises Act 1972 (as amended by section 135 of the Building Safety Act 2022) — 15 years for dwelling-related work completed on or after 28 June 2022, and 30 years for work completed before — are relevant where the agent's role touched on the dwelling's habitability.
Six years remains the practical floor for most pure block management firms; twelve is sometimes appropriate where deed appointments are routine or where the portfolio includes substantial higher-risk-building exposure. Selling the book to another agent rather than winding down does not automatically extinguish the run-off obligation; the sale documentation has to deal with it explicitly, and warranties given to the buyer typically require the seller to maintain cover for a defined period after completion.
Excess
Property managers' PI policies carry an excess (deductible) on each and every claim, payable by the firm before the policy responds. Typical figures range from £2,500 for the smallest practices to £25,000 or £50,000 for larger firms; on Building Safety Act-related or cladding-related claims the excess is often a multiple of the standard figure, and for fire-safety claims on higher-risk buildings some wordings apply a percentage of loss rather than a flat figure. A higher excess reduces premium but moves more of the small-claim risk to the firm — and a firm with a portfolio of frequent low-value section 27A applications may find that the excess swallows most claims and the policy only really responds on the catastrophic loss.
Management agreements, contractual obligations and net contribution
The management agreement under which the agent acts for each block is the substantive document on which most claims turn. Industry-standard forms — TPI's template management agreement, the RICS template, freeholder-specific bespoke forms drafted by their solicitors — vary considerably in what they impose on the agent. A management agreement that includes warranty-style obligations ("the agent warrants that all service charge demands will comply with all statutory requirements"), or that omits a net contribution clause where contractors and other professionals are also involved, or that includes broad indemnity-from-the-agent provisions, expands exposure beyond what the PI policy will respond to.
Net contribution clauses limit the agent's liability to its fair share of any loss where other parties are also responsible — without one, the agent can be left bearing 100% of a loss where, on the facts, only 30% was its fault. The wording should appear in every management agreement signed.
What insurers underwrite on, and how a firm chooses cover
Underwriters pricing property managers' PI renewals look at the size and composition of the portfolio (number of blocks, units, gross service charge throughput), the proportion of higher-risk buildings, mixed-use and build-to-rent exposure, the geographic concentration, the firm's role under the Building Safety Act, the five-year claims and notifications history, whether the firm holds buildings insurance broking authority and what commission it receives, the standard management agreement used, TPI and/or Propertymark membership status, qualification levels of senior staff, internal quality controls including section 20 protocols and service charge sign-off procedures, and the firm's CMP arrangements.
The choice of insurer, limit, retroactive date, excess and wording is the firm's. The questions worth working through each year are whether the headline limit is adequate for the worst-case exposure with headroom for defence costs; whether the wording covers all the firm's activities (including buildings insurance broking, mixed-use, BTR and any Building Safety Act roles); whether the retroactive date is continuous with previous cover; whether cladding, fire-safety and Building Safety Act provisions match the portfolio; whether run-off provision is adequate for the longest open commitments; whether management agreement obligations are consistent with the policy's cover; and whether the insurer is financially secure.
How Apex helps
Apex Insurance Brokers is an independent FCA-authorised insurance broker. We act as the firm's broker, which under the Financial Conduct Authority's Conduct of Business rules means we represent the firm's interests in the negotiation with the insurance market. We are not tied to any single insurer. In practice that means we take the firm's renewal information, present it to insurers we think will price the particular profile sensibly, negotiate terms, explain the wording differences between quotes, and document the decision so it stands up to internal compliance review and TPI or Propertymark scrutiny. We work with block management firms, mixed-use operators and managing agents across the size spectrum, including firms with higher-risk-building exposure and substantial Building Safety Act duties.
The terms on which we act are set out in our Terms of Business, our handling of personal data in our Privacy notice, and the route to raising any concerns about our service is on our Complaints page. The property managers sector page is the place to start a renewal conversation, or contact us directly. If you are within ninety days of renewal this is the moment to look at the policy you currently hold and decide whether the limit, wording, retroactive date and broker relationship are doing what you need them to; if you are mid-policy, this is the moment to make sure your file shows everything notifiable has been notified — late notification is the single most common reason a property managers' PI claim fails to be covered.
Frequently asked questions
Is Professional Indemnity Insurance mandatory for property managers in the UK?
There is no single statutory regulator that mandates PI for property managers in the way the SRA does for solicitors. The professional bodies — The Property Institute (TPI), Propertymark and RICS — expect members in independent practice to hold adequate cover under their codes, but do not publish a single flat minimum figure. The binding requirement in practice comes from management agreements, freeholder requirements and lender expectations, which routinely specify PI of £2m, £5m or £10m depending on the portfolio. For firms managing higher-risk buildings, cover is effectively mandatory in commercial terms.
How much PI cover does my property management firm need?
It depends on the size and composition of your portfolio and the contractual obligations you accept under each management agreement. Take the largest blocks under management and estimate the worst-case exposure — typically the cost of major works falling foul of the section 20 cap, plus defence costs, plus any associated insurance broking exposure. Indicative ranges: £1m–£2m for small block management practices, £2m–£5m for mid-sized firms with some higher-risk-building exposure, £5m–£10m or more for firms with substantial HRB portfolios, mixed-use operation or significant insurance broking activity.
How does the Building Safety Act 2022 affect property managers' PI?
The Act made property managers central duty-holders for higher-risk buildings — as accountable persons or principal accountable persons, or as agents to those parties. The Act requires registration with the Building Safety Regulator, a safety case and safety case report, a residents' engagement strategy, mandatory occurrence reporting and compliance with gateway requirements for refurbishment. The PI consequences are tighter underwriting of HRB exposure, sub-limits and aggregate caps on Building Safety Act-related claims, and notification requirements when the firm takes on a higher-risk-building appointment.
What is the difference between PI and Client Money Protection?
PI covers the firm's professional negligence — errors in service charge administration, section 20 consultation failures, accounting errors, insurance broking mistakes. CMP covers leaseholder and client money lost through theft, fraud, or the firm's insolvency. They sit alongside each other, not within. CMP is required for letting agency work under the Tenant Fees Act 2019 and is expected of block managers under the TPI and Propertymark Codes. A firm that handles client money needs both.
How long should I hold run-off cover after closing my property management firm?
The standard contractual limitation period is six years; deed appointments extend it to twelve. For firms whose portfolio touched on dwelling habitability, the Defective Premises Act 1972 (as amended by section 135 of the Building Safety Act 2022) gives 15 years for work completed on or after 28 June 2022 and 30 years for earlier work. Six years is the practical minimum; twelve where deed appointments are routine or HRB exposure is material. Selling the book does not automatically extinguish the obligation — the sale documentation must address it.
Does my PI policy cover buildings insurance broking activity?
Sometimes yes within the main wording, sometimes via a separate Investment & Insurance Mediation section, sometimes excluded. A firm that arranges buildings insurance for the blocks it manages, retains or rebates commission, and gives advice on cover should ensure the wording explicitly contemplates insurance mediation. The FCA's tightening expectations on commission disclosure since 2024 have made this part of the wording a regular renewal discussion.
What happens to my PI when a section 27A application is made?
Most policies require notification of any circumstance that might give rise to a claim, and a section 27A application alleging unreasonable service charges typically meets that threshold even where no claim against the agent has yet been made. Notifying early protects the firm: if the freeholder later turns on the agent for the irrecoverable shortfall, the policy in force at the date of notification will respond, not the policy in force when the claim materialises. Late notification is the most common reason a property managers' PI claim is declined.
Does my PI cover the accountable person duties under the Building Safety Act?
Most current policies cover accountable person and principal accountable person duties where the firm holds those appointments, but the schedule should be checked. Some policies sub-limit Building Safety Act-related claims, some require notification when the firm takes on a higher-risk-building appointment, and some carve out specific gateway functions. The position has been evolving since the Act came into force in 2023 and is a routine renewal item for firms with HRB portfolios.
Related guides
- Block management PI and service charge accounting
- Section 20 consultations and property manager PI
- Property managers sector page — speak to a broker
- All Apex PI sectors
About Apex Insurance Brokers
Apex Insurance Brokers Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority, FCA firm reference 724952. Registered in England and Wales, Companies House 07014570. Trading address QCS, 53 Queen Charlotte Street, Bristol BS1 4HQ; registered office c/o Westcan, 5 Anglo Office Park, Bristol BS15 1NT. Email info@apexinsurancebrokers.co.uk, telephone 0117 325 0027. This guide is general information about Professional Indemnity Insurance for UK property management firms and is not advice tailored to any individual firm's circumstances. Last reviewed: May 2026.
FAQPage JSON-LD (hand-rolled — add via Yoast Custom Field or theme injection)
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "FAQPage",
"mainEntity": [
{
"@type": "Question",
"name": "Is Professional Indemnity Insurance mandatory for property managers in the UK?",
"acceptedAnswer": {
"@type": "Answer",
"text": "There is no single statutory regulator that mandates PI for property managers in the way the SRA does for solicitors. The professional bodies — The Property Institute (TPI), Propertymark and RICS — expect members in independent practice to hold adequate cover under their codes, but do not publish a flat minimum figure. The binding requirement in practice comes from management agreements, freeholder requirements and lender expectations, which routinely specify PI of £2m, £5m or £10m depending on the portfolio. For firms managing higher-risk buildings, cover is effectively mandatory in commercial terms."
}
},
{
"@type": "Question",
"name": "How much PI cover does my property management firm need?",
"acceptedAnswer": {
"@type": "Answer",
"text": "It depends on the size and composition of your portfolio and the contractual obligations you accept under each management agreement. Take the largest blocks under management and estimate the worst-case exposure — typically the cost of major works falling foul of the section 20 cap, plus defence costs, plus any associated insurance broking exposure. Indicative ranges: £1m–£2m for small block management practices, £2m–£5m for mid-sized firms with some higher-risk-building exposure, £5m–£10m or more for firms with substantial HRB portfolios, mixed-use operation or significant insurance broking activity."
}
},
{
"@type": "Question",
"name": "How does the Building Safety Act 2022 affect property managers' PI?",
"acceptedAnswer": {
"@type": "Answer",
"text": "The Act made property managers central duty-holders for higher-risk buildings — as accountable persons or principal accountable persons, or as agents to those parties. The Act requires registration with the Building Safety Regulator, a safety case and safety case report, a residents' engagement strategy, mandatory occurrence reporting and compliance with gateway requirements for refurbishment. The PI consequences are tighter underwriting of HRB exposure, sub-limits and aggregate caps on Building Safety Act-related claims, and notification requirements when the firm takes on a higher-risk-building appointment."
}
},
{
"@type": "Question",
"name": "What is the difference between PI and Client Money Protection?",
"acceptedAnswer": {
"@type": "Answer",
"text": "PI covers the firm's professional negligence — errors in service charge administration, section 20 consultation failures, accounting errors, insurance broking mistakes. CMP covers leaseholder and client money lost through theft, fraud or the firm's insolvency. They sit alongside each other, not within. CMP is required for letting agency work under the Tenant Fees Act 2019 and is expected of block managers under the TPI and Propertymark Codes. A firm that handles client money needs both."
}
},
{
"@type": "Question",
"name": "How long should I hold run-off cover after closing my property management firm?",
"acceptedAnswer": {
"@type": "Answer",
"text": "The standard contractual limitation period is six years; deed appointments extend it to twelve. For firms whose portfolio touched on dwelling habitability, the Defective Premises Act 1972 as amended by section 135 of the Building Safety Act 2022 gives 15 years for work completed on or after 28 June 2022 and 30 years for earlier work. Six years is the practical minimum; twelve where deed appointments are routine or HRB exposure is material. Selling the book does not automatically extinguish the obligation — the sale documentation must address it."
}
},
{
"@type": "Question",
"name": "Does my PI policy cover buildings insurance broking activity?",
"acceptedAnswer": {
"@type": "Answer",
"text": "Sometimes yes within the main wording, sometimes via a separate Investment & Insurance Mediation section, sometimes excluded. A firm that arranges buildings insurance for the blocks it manages, retains or rebates commission, and gives advice on cover should ensure the wording explicitly contemplates insurance mediation. The FCA's tightening expectations on commission disclosure since 2024 have made this part of the wording a regular renewal discussion."
}
},
{
"@type": "Question",
"name": "What happens to my PI when a section 27A application is made?",
"acceptedAnswer": {
"@type": "Answer",
"text": "Most policies require notification of any circumstance that might give rise to a claim, and a section 27A application alleging unreasonable service charges typically meets that threshold even where no claim against the agent has yet been made. Notifying early protects the firm: if the freeholder later turns on the agent for the irrecoverable shortfall, the policy in force at the date of notification will respond, not the policy in force when the claim materialises. Late notification is the most common reason a property managers' PI claim is declined."
}
},
{
"@type": "Question",
"name": "Does my PI cover the accountable person duties under the Building Safety Act?",
"acceptedAnswer": {
"@type": "Answer",
"text": "Most current policies cover accountable person and principal accountable person duties where the firm holds those appointments, but the schedule should be checked. Some policies sub-limit Building Safety Act-related claims, some require notification when the firm takes on a higher-risk-building appointment, and some carve out specific gateway functions. The position has been evolving since the Act came into force in 2023 and is a routine renewal item for firms with HRB portfolios."
}
}
]
}