A sole-trader health and safety consultant, IOSH-chartered and on the OSHCR register, is retained by a small principal contractor to write a project-specific construction phase plan and review method statements on a four-storey timber-frame residential infill scheme in the south west. Eighteen months after completion, a sub-contractor's labourer falls through an unguarded riser opening on a different phase of the works and is left with life-changing injuries. The Health and Safety Executive investigates, the principal contractor is prosecuted under sections 2 and 3 of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974, and a Sentencing Council guideline fine in the high six figures is imposed. The injured worker's civil claim, run alongside, settles at around £1.8m. The principal contractor's solicitors then issue a Part 20 claim against the consultant, alleging that the construction phase plan was generic, that the method statement review failed to identify the riser-edge protection failure, and that the consultant's competence advice to the contractor was inadequate. The consultant's PI policy is the only thing standing between the firm and the contribution claim.
That kind of letter — landing two years after the consultant signed off a deliverable, with a separate criminal prosecution running in parallel — is the modern shape of the health and safety consultancy claim. Whether the consultant's Professional Indemnity Insurance responds, and on what terms, depends on the cover in force when the claim was notified, the wording of that policy, what the appointment letter said, what work the consultant signed off on, and what run-off the firm has maintained.
This guide is for principals, partners and sole-trader consultants in UK health and safety consultancy practices — IOSH and IIRSM members, OSHCR-registered consultants, asbestos surveyors and analysts, fire safety competent persons, CDM advisers and principal designers, construction H&S consultants, occupational hygienists, expert witnesses in H&S litigation, and the multi-disciplinary risk and safety practices that combine several of those services. It explains what Professional Indemnity Insurance is doing for a health and safety consultancy in 2026, what the professional registers and the wider statutory framework expect, and where the decisions at renewal genuinely matter.
What Professional Indemnity Insurance covers for health and safety consultants
Professional Indemnity Insurance — usually written as PI or PII — pays the legal costs of defending a civil claim brought against your firm by a client or third party who alleges they have suffered loss as a result of your professional advice or services, and pays any damages or settlement awarded against you up to the limit of indemnity. H&S consultants' PI is written on a claims-made basis: the policy that responds is the one in force when the claim or circumstance is first notified, not the policy in force when the work was actually done. This makes continuity of cover, retroactive dates and run-off central to whether a claim is ever paid.
For a health and safety consultancy "professional services" is a broad envelope — compliance advice, risk assessments, audits, inspections, gap analyses against HSE-published guidance and Approved Codes of Practice, safety management system design (HSG65, ISO 45001), training delivery and competence assurance, incident investigation and root cause analysis, expert witness work in civil and criminal proceedings, CDM 2015 advice and principal designer duties, fire safety advice and fire risk assessment, asbestos surveys and management plan production under the Control of Asbestos Regulations 2012, occupational hygiene sampling and exposure assessment under COSHH 2002, RIDDOR 2013 notification advice, and bespoke services such as accident reconstruction.
The product does not cover the consultant's own fee disputes (in most policies), regulatory fines or penalties imposed on the consultant or anyone else, dishonesty or fraud, work outside the firm's defined professional activities, or — critically for this sector — criminal liability under the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 itself. The last is one of the most misunderstood points in the class and is dealt with in detail below.
The regulatory and professional backdrop
Unlike architects (ARB), solicitors (SRA) and surveyors (RICS), health and safety consultants do not have a single statutory regulator that mandates Professional Indemnity Insurance as a condition of practising. The framework is layered — professional institutions, voluntary registers, statutory duties under H&S legislation, and contractual requirements imposed by clients — and a consultant's PI obligations sit across all of them.
IOSH (the Institution of Occupational Safety and Health) is the chartered professional body for the field, with grades from Affiliate through Technical Member, Graduate Member, Chartered Member and Chartered Fellow. IOSH's Code of Conduct requires members to maintain competence through CPD and to act within the limits of that competence; for members in independent practice, it expects adequate insurance arrangements consistent with the work undertaken. IIRSM (the International Institute of Risk and Safety Management) is the parallel body for risk and safety management practitioners across a wider range of risk disciplines, with similar competence and ethical expectations of members in independent practice.
The OSHCR (Occupational Safety and Health Consultants Register) sits across the professional bodies. It was set up in 2011 following the Löfstedt Review of health and safety regulation as a voluntary, externally-monitored register of competent consultants advising on general H&S management. Registration requires chartered or chartered-equivalent status from one of the participating institutions (IOSH, IIRSM, BOHS, IEHF, IIAI, REHIS, IFE and CIEH among others), demonstrated CPD, and adherence to a code of conduct. The HSE and small business clients alike treat OSHCR registration as the working competence signal for general H&S advisory work, and a substantial proportion of public-sector procurement frameworks now reference it.
The practical consequence is that the binding minimum cover for most H&S consultancy firms is set not by their institution or by the register but by their clients — public-sector framework agreements, principal contractor appointment letters, large-employer supplier onboarding documents and dutyholder appointment terms routinely specify PI requirements at £1m, £2m, £5m or £10m per claim, sometimes with explicit run-off requirements aligned to the limitation period for the work.
The statutory framework the consultant is advising on is dense and worth listing because it shapes both the work and the claim exposure. The Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 (HSWA) is the primary criminal statute: section 2 (duty to employees), section 3 (duty to non-employees), section 7 (duty on employees including senior employees) and section 37 (consent, connivance or neglect by directors and senior managers) are the everyday charging sections. The Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 (MHSWR) require risk assessment, competent assistance and the planning, organisation, control, monitoring and review of preventive and protective measures — the regulation 7 "competent person" requirement is the legal hook that brings the H&S consultant into many engagements.
The Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 (CDM 2015) allocate duties between client, principal designer, principal contractor, designers, contractors and workers on construction projects. The Building Safety Act 2022 introduced the higher-risk-building (HRB) duty-holder regime — a separate set of dutyholder appointments running in parallel with CDM 2015 on residential buildings 18m or above, or 7 storeys or more with at least two dwellings — together with gateways one, two and three, the golden thread, and the Building Safety Regulator within the HSE. The Fire Safety Act 2021 clarified that the structure, external walls and individual flat entrance doors of multi-occupied residential buildings fall within the scope of the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005; the Fire Safety (England) Regulations 2022 introduced specific duties on Responsible Persons in residential buildings above 11m and 18m thresholds.
The Control of Asbestos Regulations 2012 (CAR 2012) govern the duty to manage asbestos in non-domestic premises and the licensing regime for higher-risk asbestos work; consultants advising on asbestos management plans, conducting management surveys or refurbishment-and-demolition surveys operate in this framework. The Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002 (COSHH) govern exposure to hazardous substances; occupational hygiene sampling and exposure assessment sit here. The Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations 2013 (RIDDOR) require duty-holders to report specified injuries, ill-health and dangerous occurrences to the HSE; consultants are routinely asked whether a given incident is reportable.
The Sentencing Council guideline for health and safety offences, in force from 1 February 2016, transformed the fines landscape. The guideline uses a turnover-banded matrix that produced an order-of-magnitude increase in fines for medium and large organisations and continues to do so. The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 sits alongside it for the gravest cases. And the HSE Fee for Intervention (FFI) regime allows the HSE to recover its inspection costs (currently at an hourly rate published by the HSE) from duty-holders found to be in material breach — typically borne by the duty-holder, but the consultant can be chained into civil claims for those costs.
What H&S consultants' PI actually covers — the wording detail
A standard UK health and safety consultants' PI policy covers civil liability arising from breach of professional duty by the insured. Two policies that look similar at headline level can respond very differently; the wording variables that matter most are the following.
The definition of professional services. Some policies define activities by reference to a scheduled list; others use an open definition referencing "the professional activities of a health and safety consultant". For multi-disciplinary firms, or firms doing work the schedule does not contemplate (asbestos surveying under CAR 2012, fire risk assessment under the RRO, principal designer duties under CDM 2015 or the BSA, expert witness work, occupational hygiene sampling), the schedule should be checked against the actual mix. Asbestos work and fire safety work are particularly often scheduled separately, with their own sub-limits.
The duty of care covered. Policies cover the common-law and contractual duty of reasonable skill and care. Most exclude liability assumed for fitness for purpose, performance guarantees, absolute warranties or any contractual standard exceeding reasonable skill and care — uninsured for the consultant who signs them. Appointment letters that say the consultant will "ensure compliance" rather than "advise on compliance" sit in dangerous territory.
The retroactive date. Because the policy is claims-made, the retroactive date controls how far back the policy will reach. "Unlimited" reaches any past work; a date set at, say, 1 January 2018 excludes earlier work. Continuity of retroactive cover across renewals is one of the most important points the broker checks.
Defence costs, aggregate caps, exclusions and sub-limits. Most policies pay defence costs within the limit of indemnity, written on an "any one claim" basis with aggregate caps on specified categories — typically asbestos, fire safety, cladding, Building Safety Act work, abuse, and pollution. Cover for HSE investigation legal costs is the central wording question for this sector and is often handled either as a sub-limit within the PI policy, as a separate legal expenses extension, or as a standalone defence-costs section keyed to "regulatory investigations and inquiries". Whether defence costs respond before any charge is laid, and whether they respond only to the consultant's own defence or also to advising the duty-holder under investigation, varies between policies and matters greatly in practice.
Where PI meets public liability and the "safe systems of work" question
A point that often confuses smaller H&S consultancies: PI is not the only relevant policy. Public Liability (PL) cover responds to claims for bodily injury or property damage caused by the consultant's operations or presence — for example, if a consultant tripping over a cable on a site visit injures a worker, or knocks over equipment during an audit. PI responds to claims for financial loss arising from professional advice. The overlap appears where injured-party civil claims chain back to the consultant.
The recurring issue is the "advice on safe systems of work" liability question. Where a worker is injured and the duty-holder is sued and prosecuted, the duty-holder will often look to recover from any professional adviser whose deliverable touched the system that failed — the consultant who reviewed the method statement, the consultant who wrote the risk assessment, the consultant who delivered the toolbox talk, the consultant who signed off the construction phase plan. The civil liability in that chain is a PI exposure: it is loss caused by alleged failure of professional advice, not by the consultant's physical operations. Sites where the consultant has had no physical presence at all can still produce PI claims.
The practical guidance for almost every H&S consultancy is to hold both PI and PL, ideally with the same insurer or in coordinated wordings, with PL limits typically £2m or £5m and PI limits sized as discussed below.
How much cover do you actually need?
The minimum required by your client's appointment is rarely the right answer — it is the minimum required for that contract. The figure that's right for your firm depends on the size, complexity and risk profile of the work you take on, the contractual obligations you accept, and the categories of duty-holder you advise.
Indicative ranges, with the usual caveat that every firm's profile is different: a sole-trader consultant working with SME employers, doing general H&S management advice, risk assessments and training, may sit at £1m to £2m per claim; a small consultancy with construction H&S work, CDM advice and some principal designer appointments typically sits at £2m to £5m; a multi-disciplinary firm doing asbestos surveying, fire risk assessment in higher-risk buildings, BSA gateway work and substantial expert witness work commonly carries £5m to £10m or more, sometimes in layered programmes. The figure to test against is the worst-case civil claim — a serious injury or fatality on a site where the consultant's deliverable is in the chain of causation can produce damages and costs well into seven figures.
The shape of the limit matters as well as the headline. An "any one claim" limit with unlimited aggregate is different from "any one claim" with an aggregate cap, which is different again from an "in the aggregate" policy where one large claim exhausts cover for the year. Asbestos-related and BSA-related claims are commonly aggregated separately, with the aggregate cap acting as an effective ceiling on the firm's exposure to that work.
Where claims come from — the recurring patterns
Working from anonymised industry patterns, H&S consultants' PI claims cluster around the following: inadequate or generic risk assessments, where the assessment failed to identify a hazard that subsequently caused harm, or used template content that did not reflect the actual conditions on the site; method statement and construction phase plan failures, where the consultant produced or reviewed documentation that did not deal adequately with a foreseeable hazard; competent person advice under MHSWR regulation 7, where the consultant's advice to the duty-holder is alleged to have been inadequate; incident investigation and post-incident reports, where the consultant's investigation under-recorded or mischaracterised root causes in a way that prejudiced the duty-holder's later defence; expert witness work, where the Civil Procedure Rules Part 35 framework sets the duties owed to the court and CPR 35-related complaints can themselves become claims; asbestos surveys and management plans, where a survey missed presumed or known ACMs that were subsequently disturbed or where a management plan was inadequate to control the duty under CAR 2012 regulation 4; fire risk assessments and fire safety advice, where post-Grenfell scrutiny of competence and methodology has driven a substantial uptick in claims and notifications; and principal designer and CDM 2015 duty-holder appointments, where the consultant has stepped into a statutory dutyholder role and the appointment is in the chain when something goes wrong (the CDM principal designer cluster article covers this in detail).
Defence costs on a contested H&S consultants' PI claim typically run from low five figures on a straightforward dispute over a single deliverable, to mid-six figures on a multi-party civil claim arising from a serious injury or fatality. Where an HSE investigation runs in parallel with the civil action, the legal costs of supporting the duty-holder's defence (which the consultant is often pulled into) can be a substantial separate exposure.
Criminal versus civil — what PI does and does not respond to
This is the single most important point in this guide and the one most often misunderstood. Professional Indemnity Insurance responds to civil claims for damages and the legal costs of defending them. It does not pay criminal fines. Fines imposed under HSWA 1974, CDM 2015, CAR 2012, the RRO, the Fire Safety (England) Regulations 2022 or any other H&S regulatory regime — whether imposed on the consultant directly or on the duty-holder — are not insurable as a matter of UK public policy and are excluded from every standard PI policy.
What can be covered, subject to wording, is the legal costs of defending an HSE investigation or prosecution against the consultant personally — usually within a defence costs sub-limit, sometimes via a legal expenses extension. Cover for the consultant's involvement in defending the duty-holder's prosecution (as an interested party, as a witness, as the author of relevant deliverables) is more variable; some policies extend, some do not, and some treat it as recoverable only where the consultant is at risk of joinder. The HSE's Fee for Intervention costs against the duty-holder are also routinely outside the PI policy when imposed on the duty-holder but can be recoverable as part of a civil contribution claim against the consultant — which would then be a PI loss.
The criminal vs civil distinction interacts with the section 37 HSWA personal liability of directors and senior managers, and with the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007. Neither liability is itself insurable in the criminal sense; both can drive separate civil claims that are. For consultancies operating as limited companies, a separate question is whether Directors and Officers (D&O) cover is in place to fund individual director defence costs in section 37 prosecutions — D&O sits alongside PI rather than as a substitute.
Run-off — six years, twelve, or longer
Because PI is written on a claims-made basis, the consultant who has retired, sold or wound down a firm is uninsured for past work the moment the last working policy lapses, unless run-off cover is bought. Run-off is a non-renewing policy that responds to claims notified during its term arising from work done before the firm ceased — bought as a single up-front premium, typically calculated as a multiple of the firm's last working policy premium.
The right run-off period depends on the longest open commitment the firm has. The standard contractual limitation period under English law is six years from the cause of action; where the firm has signed contracts as deeds (less common in this sector than for engineers or architects, but it does happen, particularly for substantial dutyholder appointments), the period is twelve years; the Latent Damage Act 1986 can extend the period in cases of latent damage not reasonably discoverable; and for personal injury claims (which is what most of the contribution claims feeding back to consultants will be), the Limitation Act 1980 three-year period runs from the date of knowledge, which for industrial diseases such as asbestos-related illness can be decades after the work was done.
A consultancy that has done substantial asbestos survey or occupational hygiene work in a long career faces a real prospect of claims being notified twenty or thirty years after the work, where the asbestos disease causation linking back to a survey defect emerges late. Six years remains the practical floor for most firms; twelve is sometimes appropriate; where asbestos, fire safety or BSA work is in the back catalogue, longer arrangements need to be considered alongside the cost and availability of cover. Selling rather than winding down does not automatically extinguish the run-off obligation; the sale documentation has to deal with it explicitly.
Excess
H&S consultants' PI policies carry an excess (deductible) on each and every claim, payable by the firm before the policy responds. Typical figures range from £1,000 for the smallest practices to £10,000 or £25,000 for larger firms; on asbestos-related, fire-safety or BSA-related claims the excess is often a multiple of the standard figure, sometimes a percentage of the loss. A higher excess reduces premium but moves more of the small-claim risk to the firm. Defence costs are usually within the excess, meaning the consultant pays the early legal spend before the policy engages.
What insurers underwrite on, and how a firm chooses cover
Underwriters pricing H&S consultants' PI renewals look at fee income split by service line (general H&S advisory, CDM and construction H&S, asbestos surveying, fire safety, occupational hygiene, expert witness, training); sector and client type, with particular attention to construction, residential, healthcare, education and higher-risk-building work; the proportion of work engaging the Building Safety Act, asbestos, fire safety or cladding remediation; the five-year claims and notifications history; the standard form appointments and frameworks the firm operates under; whether the firm holds principal designer, principal contractor or BSA dutyholder appointments; OSHCR registration and the chartered status of key consultants; CPD evidence and quality controls.
The choice of insurer, limit, retroactive date, excess and wording is the firm's. The questions worth working through each year are whether the headline limit is adequate for the worst-case civil exposure with headroom for defence costs; whether the wording covers all the firm's activities (including asbestos, fire safety, principal designer roles and any new service lines); whether the retroactive date is continuous with previous cover; whether defence costs for HSE investigations are dealt with explicitly; whether asbestos, fire-safety and BSA provisions match the projects the firm is taking on; whether run-off provision is adequate for the longest open commitments; and whether the insurer is financially secure.
How Apex helps
Apex Insurance Brokers is an independent FCA-authorised insurance broker. We act as the firm's broker, which under the Financial Conduct Authority's Conduct of Business rules means we represent the firm's interests in the negotiation with the insurance market. We are not tied to any single insurer. In practice that means we take the firm's renewal information, present it to insurers we think will price the particular profile sensibly, negotiate terms, explain the wording differences between quotes, and document the decision so it stands up to internal compliance review and institutional or framework monitoring. We work with health and safety consultancies across the range — from sole-trader OSHCR-registered general practitioners through to multi-disciplinary risk and safety firms with substantial construction, asbestos and BSA exposure.
The terms on which we act are set out in our Terms of Business, our handling of personal data in our Privacy notice, and the route to raising any concerns about our service is on our Complaints page. The health and safety consultants sector page is the place to start a renewal conversation, or contact us directly. The two cluster articles — on construction H&S consultant PI and on CDM principal designer PI exposure — drill into the two areas where the underwriting and claim patterns have moved most in recent years. If you are within ninety days of renewal, this is the moment to look at the policy you currently hold and decide whether the limit, wording, retroactive date and broker relationship are doing what you need them to. If you are mid-policy, this is the moment to make sure your file shows everything notifiable has been notified — late notification remains the single most common reason a claim fails to be covered.
Frequently asked questions
Is Professional Indemnity Insurance mandatory for health and safety consultants in the UK?
There is no single statutory regulator that mandates PI for H&S consultants in the way ARB does for architects or the SRA for solicitors. IOSH and IIRSM expect members in independent practice to hold adequate cover under their codes of conduct, and OSHCR registration is conditioned on appropriate insurance, but no body publishes a fixed flat minimum figure. The binding requirement in practice comes from client appointments — public-sector frameworks, principal contractor onboarding, supplier qualification and dutyholder appointments routinely specify £1m, £2m, £5m or £10m. For construction-facing work and dutyholder appointments, cover is effectively mandatory in commercial terms.
Does my PI policy pay HSE fines if I am prosecuted?
No. Criminal fines imposed under HSWA 1974, CDM 2015, CAR 2012 or any other H&S regulatory regime are not insurable under UK public policy and are excluded from every standard PI policy. What can be covered, subject to wording, is the legal costs of defending an HSE investigation or prosecution against the consultant — usually within a defence costs sub-limit or a legal expenses extension. HSE Fee for Intervention costs imposed on a duty-holder are not paid by the consultant's PI either, but where the duty-holder recovers them from the consultant by civil contribution claim, that contribution claim is a PI loss.
How much PI cover does my H&S consultancy need?
It depends on the size and complexity of your work and the obligations you accept. The standard test is to consider the worst-case civil exposure from work in your pipeline — typically a serious injury or fatality on a site where one of your deliverables is in the chain of causation. Indicative ranges: £1m–£2m for sole traders advising SME employers, £2m–£5m for small consultancies with construction H&S and CDM work, £5m–£10m or more for multi-disciplinary firms with asbestos, fire safety, BSA gateway and substantial expert witness work. The headline figure is rarely the only question — sub-limits and aggregates matter as much.
How does the Building Safety Act 2022 affect my PI?
The BSA introduced the higher-risk-building dutyholder regime, gateways one to three under the Building Safety Regulator, and the golden thread. Consultants advising on HRB projects, holding principal designer appointments for HRBs, or carrying out fire safety competence work in residential buildings within scope, face tighter underwriting, sub-limits and aggregate caps on BSA-related claims, and explicit questions about competence frameworks. Section 135 of the Act extended limitation periods under the Defective Premises Act 1972 — relevant where the consultant's advice touches dwellings.
What is the OSHCR and does it matter for my PI?
The Occupational Safety and Health Consultants Register is a voluntary, externally-monitored register of competent consultants set up in 2011 following the Löfstedt Review. Registration requires chartered or chartered-equivalent status from a participating professional body, demonstrated CPD and adherence to a code of conduct. HSE and many public-sector buyers treat OSHCR registration as the working competence signal for general H&S advisory work. Insurers see OSHCR registration as positive risk evidence at renewal, though it is not a contractual condition of cover under standard policies.
How long should I hold run-off cover after closing my consultancy?
The standard contractual limitation period is six years; deed appointments extend it to twelve. For personal injury claims, the Limitation Act 1980 three-year period runs from the date of knowledge, which for industrial diseases such as asbestos-related illness can be decades after the work was done. A consultancy that has done substantial asbestos or occupational hygiene work in a long career may be exposed long after retirement. Six years is the practical floor for most firms; longer where asbestos, fire safety or BSA work is in the back catalogue.
What happens if I have a notified claim or HSE investigation at renewal?
The renewal market will be tighter and pricing typically harder. Some insurers may decline to quote; others will require detailed information about the matter and the firm's response. The broker's role is to present the circumstance fairly to the market — well-documented circumstances with clear remediation steps generally renew more sensibly than poorly-handled ones. Where the open market closes, alternative routes exist (specialist insurers, layered programmes) but the terms will differ from a clean renewal. Notifying early and in full is always the right answer; late notification is the most common reason cover fails.
Do I need separate cover for asbestos surveys and fire risk assessments?
Asbestos surveying and fire safety advice are often scheduled separately within a PI policy, with their own sub-limits and sometimes their own retroactive dates. Whether you need a separate policy depends on the volume and risk profile of the work — most consultancies can cover both within a single combined PI policy, but the schedule needs to record the activities explicitly. Asbestos analyst work (UKAS-accredited bulk identification, air monitoring) sometimes sits in a separately-rated section. The broker's job is to make sure the actual activity profile matches what the policy lists.
Related guides
- Construction H&S consultant PI — the construction-site adviser exposure
- CDM principal designer PI — the dutyholder appointment under CDM 2015 and the BSA
- Health and safety consultants sector page — speak to a broker
- All Apex PI sectors
About Apex Insurance Brokers
Apex Insurance Brokers Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority, FCA firm reference 724952. Registered in England and Wales, Companies House 07014570. Trading address QCS, 53 Queen Charlotte Street, Bristol BS1 4HQ; registered office c/o Westcan, 5 Anglo Office Park, Bristol BS15 1NT. Email info@apexinsurancebrokers.co.uk, telephone 0117 325 0027. This guide is general information about Professional Indemnity Insurance for UK health and safety consultancies and is not advice tailored to any individual firm's circumstances. Last reviewed: May 2026.
FAQPage JSON-LD (hand-rolled — add via Yoast Custom Field or theme injection)
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "FAQPage",
"mainEntity": [
{
"@type": "Question",
"name": "Is Professional Indemnity Insurance mandatory for health and safety consultants in the UK?",
"acceptedAnswer": {
"@type": "Answer",
"text": "There is no single statutory regulator that mandates PI for H&S consultants in the way ARB does for architects or the SRA for solicitors. IOSH and IIRSM expect members in independent practice to hold adequate cover under their codes of conduct, and OSHCR registration is conditioned on appropriate insurance, but no body publishes a fixed flat minimum. The binding requirement in practice comes from client appointments — public-sector frameworks, principal contractor onboarding and dutyholder appointments routinely specify £1m, £2m, £5m or £10m. For construction-facing work, cover is effectively mandatory in commercial terms."
}
},
{
"@type": "Question",
"name": "Does my PI policy pay HSE fines if I am prosecuted?",
"acceptedAnswer": {
"@type": "Answer",
"text": "No. Criminal fines imposed under HSWA 1974, CDM 2015, CAR 2012 or any other H&S regulatory regime are not insurable under UK public policy and are excluded from every standard PI policy. What can be covered, subject to wording, is the legal costs of defending an HSE investigation or prosecution against the consultant — usually within a defence costs sub-limit or a legal expenses extension. HSE Fee for Intervention costs imposed on a duty-holder are not paid by the consultant's PI either, but where the duty-holder recovers them from the consultant by civil contribution claim, that contribution claim is a PI loss."
}
},
{
"@type": "Question",
"name": "How much PI cover does my H&S consultancy need?",
"acceptedAnswer": {
"@type": "Answer",
"text": "It depends on the size and complexity of your work and the obligations you accept. The standard test is to consider the worst-case civil exposure from work in your pipeline, typically a serious injury or fatality on a site where one of your deliverables is in the chain of causation. Indicative ranges: £1m–£2m for sole traders advising SME employers, £2m–£5m for small consultancies with construction H&S and CDM work, £5m–£10m or more for multi-disciplinary firms with asbestos, fire safety, BSA gateway and substantial expert witness work. The headline figure is rarely the only question — sub-limits and aggregates matter as much."
}
},
{
"@type": "Question",
"name": "How does the Building Safety Act 2022 affect my PI?",
"acceptedAnswer": {
"@type": "Answer",
"text": "The BSA introduced the higher-risk-building dutyholder regime, gateways one to three under the Building Safety Regulator, and the golden thread. Consultants advising on HRB projects, holding principal designer appointments for HRBs, or carrying out fire safety competence work in residential buildings within scope, face tighter underwriting, sub-limits and aggregate caps on BSA-related claims, and explicit questions about competence frameworks. Section 135 of the Act also extended limitation periods under the Defective Premises Act 1972 — relevant where the consultant's advice touches dwellings."
}
},
{
"@type": "Question",
"name": "What is the OSHCR and does it matter for my PI?",
"acceptedAnswer": {
"@type": "Answer",
"text": "The Occupational Safety and Health Consultants Register is a voluntary, externally-monitored register of competent consultants set up in 2011 following the Löfstedt Review. Registration requires chartered or chartered-equivalent status from a participating professional body, demonstrated CPD and adherence to a code of conduct. HSE and many public-sector buyers treat OSHCR registration as the working competence signal for general H&S advisory work. Insurers see OSHCR registration as positive risk evidence at renewal, though it is not a contractual condition of cover under standard policies."
}
},
{
"@type": "Question",
"name": "How long should I hold run-off cover after closing my consultancy?",
"acceptedAnswer": {
"@type": "Answer",
"text": "The standard contractual limitation period is six years; deed appointments extend it to twelve. For personal injury claims, the Limitation Act 1980 three-year period runs from the date of knowledge, which for industrial diseases such as asbestos-related illness can be decades after the work was done. A consultancy that has done substantial asbestos or occupational hygiene work in a long career may be exposed long after retirement. Six years is the practical floor for most firms; longer where asbestos, fire safety or BSA work is in the back catalogue."
}
},
{
"@type": "Question",
"name": "What happens if I have a notified claim or HSE investigation at renewal?",
"acceptedAnswer": {
"@type": "Answer",
"text": "The renewal market will be tighter and pricing typically harder. Some insurers may decline to quote; others will require detailed information about the matter and the firm's response. The broker's role is to present the circumstance fairly to the market — well-documented circumstances with clear remediation steps generally renew more sensibly than poorly-handled ones. Where the open market closes, alternative routes exist but the terms will differ from a clean renewal. Notifying early and in full is always the right answer; late notification is the most common reason cover fails."
}
},
{
"@type": "Question",
"name": "Do I need separate cover for asbestos surveys and fire risk assessments?",
"acceptedAnswer": {
"@type": "Answer",
"text": "Asbestos surveying and fire safety advice are often scheduled separately within a PI policy, with their own sub-limits and sometimes their own retroactive dates. Whether you need a separate policy depends on the volume and risk profile of the work — most consultancies can cover both within a single combined PI policy, but the schedule needs to record the activities explicitly. Asbestos analyst work (UKAS-accredited bulk identification, air monitoring) sometimes sits in a separately-rated section. The broker's job is to make sure the actual activity profile matches what the policy lists."
}
}
]
}