FCA authorised · FRN 724952 0117 325 0027Quote & buy →
Professional indemnity explained
PI insurance for wealth managers is cover for claims that a firm's investment management or advice caused a client financial loss through negligence or breach of duty. It matters because a single mandate breach or unsuitable portfolio can produce redress, Ombudsman awards and defence costs well beyond a firm's spare capital.
Part of: Professional indemnity insurance
In short
Wealth managers usually buy professional indemnity insurance to meet claims and complaints about suitability, mandate breaches, trading errors and administration failures. Whether a specific FCA rule makes PII compulsory depends on the firm's permissions and prudential category, but most discretionary and advisory firms carry it in practice. Cover is commonly written on a claims-made basis, sits alongside crime, cyber and D&O policies, and needs limits that reflect portfolio sizes, client numbers and the Ombudsman's award limits. A good placement depends on a clear description of the firm's investment process.
Almost all do, in practice. Clients, platforms, custodians, introducers and acquirers commonly expect it, and a portfolio loss claim can easily exceed a firm's regulatory capital. Whether it is a regulatory requirement depends on how the firm is classified.
The FCA's professional indemnity insurance page identifies two main sets of PII rules: IPRU-INV 13 for personal investment firms, and MIPRU 3 for firms carrying on insurance distribution or home finance mediation. Many advice-led wealth firms fall within IPRU-INV 13. Discretionary managers that are MIFIDPRU investment firms are governed mainly by own funds and liquidity requirements rather than the IPRU-INV 13 PII rules, so for them PII is often a risk and commercial decision, although other rules can apply depending on the firm's wider permissions. Check your firm's category with your compliance team, and see our note on discretionary and advisory permissions.
| Claim type | How it typically arises | How PI usually responds |
|---|---|---|
| Suitability | Risk profile, capacity for loss or objectives not reflected in the portfolio or recommendation. | Commonly the core cover, subject to the policy terms and any product exclusions. |
| Mandate breach | Holdings outside agreed asset classes, concentration limits or ethical restrictions. | Usually covered as a breach of professional duty; check wording on contractual liability. |
| Trading and dealing errors | Wrong stock, wrong quantity, missed instruction or delayed switch. | Often covered, sometimes with a separate excess; some policies need specific trading error wording. |
| Administration | Missed ISA subscription, pension contribution or tax deadline. | Commonly covered where it is a negligent act, error or omission. |
| Pensions and transfers | Drawdown, SIPP investments and transfers advised alongside portfolio management. | May be restricted or excluded; disclose this business clearly. |
Poor investment performance on its own is not normally a claim. The issue is usually whether the firm did what it agreed to do and what a competent manager would have done. Our guide to suitability claims explains how insurers approach these.
Retail clients can take complaints to the Financial Ombudsman Service. The Ombudsman decides what is fair and reasonable, can make awards up to its award limit and can recommend more. Its time limits run six years from the event or three years from awareness, with no 15-year longstop, so wealth management complaints can arrive long after the portfolio was set up.
If a firm fails, eligible clients may claim from the FSCS, which pays up to £85,000 per eligible person, per firm for investment claims against firms failing after 1 April 2019. That protects clients, not the firm or its directors.
When setting limits, think about the largest single client portfolio, the possibility of one error affecting many portfolios on a model, and how aggregation clauses treat related claims. Firms with larger books or institutional mandates may need excess layers; see mid-market PI placements.
Buying these from the same market can reduce gaps, but it is not essential. What matters is that wordings dovetail.
Underwriters look for evidence that the investment process is controlled and that clients get what they signed up for. The proposal form is only part of the story; a short covering note explaining how the firm works often makes a real difference to terms.
Insurers also look at Consumer Duty outcomes testing; see Consumer Duty and PI. Firms that can show error logs being acted on, rather than just kept, tend to present better.
These examples are illustrative only.
A rebalancing instruction applies the wrong model to 60 cautious clients for three weeks. Losses are small per client but significant in total. Whether this is one claim or many depends on the aggregation wording, which affects how many excesses apply.
A client with a fossil fuel exclusion finds holdings in an oil producer. They complain to the Ombudsman, seeking the difference against a compliant portfolio. The firm notifies the matter as a claim and the insurer handles it subject to the excess.
A wealth manager buys a retiring adviser's client bank and moves the clients onto its discretionary service. A year later one of the acquired clients complains about advice the retiring adviser gave in 2018. Whether the buyer is exposed depends on how the deal was structured, and whether the buyer's PI responds depends on its retroactive date and any acquisition terms agreed with the insurer.
Before renewal, gather assets under management and advice, the split between discretionary, advisory and execution-only, investment process and oversight, complaints data, and acquisition history. Our wealth managers guide sets out the wider risk picture. Apex arranges PI for wealth managers; a broker reads every enquiry.
It depends on the firm's prudential category and permissions. IPRU-INV 13 sets PII rules for personal investment firms, and MIPRU 3 applies to insurance and mortgage distribution. MIFIDPRU investment firms rely mainly on capital rules, but most still buy PI for commercial and risk reasons.
Not on its own. PI usually responds where the loss follows a negligent act, error, omission or breach of duty, such as unsuitable investments or a mandate breach. Ordinary market falls within an agreed, suitable strategy are not normally a claim.
Often, but not always automatically. Some wordings cover dealing and trading errors as standard, others need an extension or apply a separate excess. Check whether costs of correcting an error before any client complaint are covered.
There is no single figure. Firms commonly consider their largest client portfolios, Ombudsman award limits, how many clients one process error could affect, and contractual requirements from platforms or acquirers. Aggregation wording and whether defence costs erode the limit also matter.
Some PI policies give limited cover for employee dishonesty, but theft of money or assets is more commonly handled under a crime policy. Check how your PI and crime wordings interact so there is no gap.
Tell us what your business does, your turnover and any claims. A broker reads every enquiry and comes back with options. No fee for a quote. Or call 0117 325 0027.
Get a PI quote Request a callbackApex Insurance Brokers Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Registered in England and Wales, company number 07014570. This page is general information, not advice on your individual circumstances, and it does not guarantee that cover will be available or on what terms.
