Architects Professional Indemnity Insurance — The Complete UK Guide 2026

This guide pulls together what matters: ARB's expected standards, the aggregate exceptions for cladding and fire safety, what drives premium, how to choose a broker, and what to do at renewal.

It is written for principals, sole practitioners, practice managers, and partners who handle the renewal each year and want to understand the rules, not just receive a number.

TL;DR — the headline points

• Every ARB-registered architect in private practice is expected to hold professional indemnity insurance that meets ARB's PII Guidance issued under Standard 4 of the Architects Code. The duty sits on the registered architect personally as well as on the practice.
• The minimum expected limit is £250,000 each-and-every-claim on a civil liability basis. This is a single flat figure rather than a banded scale.
• Aggregate cover is acceptable for four specific categories: fire safety claims, cladding claims, asbestos, and pollution. No other categories may be written on aggregate.
• Run-off cover is required when an architect ceases practice: six years in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland, five years in Scotland, at the same level as the last year prior to cessation.
• The Building Safety Act 2022 materially extended limitation periods under the Defective Premises Act, retrospectively to 30 years for claims that had accrued before 28 June 2022 and prospectively to 15 years for claims accruing after that date.
• Premium has been hard for several years, particularly for practices with cladding or higher-risk building exposure. Capacity has slowly returned in 2024-25 and the market is materially better than it was at the bottom.
• The right broker matters more than it did pre-2017 because insurer appetite varies widely by practice type. A broker with access to the UK PI insurer market can identify which insurer is currently appetite-positive for your specific work mix.

If you already know the basics, skip to the section relevant to your situation.

ARB guidance expects a minimum limit of indemnity of £250,000 on an each and every claim basis, and a minimum of six years of run-off cover — five years in Scotland — held at the same level as the last year before the practice ceased.

What ARB-registered practices must have

The Architects Registration Board publishes the PII Guidance that sits under Standard 4 of the Architects Code: Standards of Conduct and Practice. It applies to every ARB-registered architect in private practice, including sole practitioners, and a failure to follow it can be taken into account in any investigation into an architect's conduct or competence.

Note on terminology. ARB does not publish "Minimum Terms" in the way the SRA does for solicitors. The ARB document is guidance setting expected standards. The substance is enforced through the Architects Code, but the framing is softer than the SRA regime. We use "expected" or "ARB's expected standards" throughout this guide for that reason.

The key requirements.

Indemnity limit. £250,000 each-and-every-claim minimum on a civil liability basis. The "each-and-every-claim" structure means each separate claim attracts the full minimum limit independently, except where the four permitted aggregate exceptions apply (see below). The £250k is a flat figure; ARB does not band it by fee income.

Civil liability basis. Cover should be on a civil liability basis, which is broader than "negligence, error or omission" wording. Civil liability cover responds to any civil liability arising from professional services, not only negligence claims.

Permitted aggregate exceptions. Four specific categories may be written on an aggregate basis: fire safety claims, cladding claims, asbestos, and pollution. No other categories may be aggregated under the ARB guidance. ARB's definitions of fire safety and cladding claims are reproduced in the next section.

Aggregated cover may also be restricted to direct losses arising from a negligent act, meaning consequential losses may be excluded. This is worth checking carefully in any policy with an aggregated cladding or fire safety section.

Aggregated cover only when comprehensive cover is unavailable. ARB is explicit that aggregate or restricted cover for these categories should only be accepted "where there is no alternative after you have taken all reasonable steps to find comprehensive cover". At each renewal, architects are expected to re-test the market and try to remove aggregation or other restrictions. Evidence of that exercise should be retained.

No complete exclusion. ARB is firm that "it is not acceptable to carry out architectural work which is subject to a complete exclusion from insurance cover". Aggregated cover is fine; a total exclusion for work the practice continues to undertake is not.

Run-off cover on cessation. When a registered architect ceases practice, including through retirement, business closure, or a merger where the original entity ceases, they should maintain six years' run-off cover (five years in Scotland) at the same level as the final year of cover. ARB also flags that liabilities under contracts made under seal (deeds) can run for 12 years, and Defective Premises Act claims now run materially longer (see Building Safety Act section), so principals should consider whether longer run-off is appropriate even where six years technically discharges the ARB obligation.

No ARB-approved insurer panel. Unlike SRA solicitors PI, ARB does not maintain a panel of approved insurers. The expectation is that cover meets the standards in the PII Guidance. ARB publishes a reference list of brokers active in the architects PI market, which is updated periodically.

Notifications. Para 8.1 of the ARB guidance: architects must notify insurers at the earliest opportunity of any circumstance that is likely to lead to a claim. Late notification is one of the most common ways architects compromise cover. Every submission Apex makes carries a named broker, and our page on how we place architects professional indemnity sets out what that means in practice.

How architects PI differs from other professions

For context, here is how the architects framework compares to neighbouring UK regulated professions.

Solicitors under the SRA work to a much higher minimum: £2m each-and-every-claim for sole practitioners and partnerships, £3m each-and-every-claim for LLPs and other incorporated practices. No aggregate exceptions are permitted, and cover must be placed with an SRA Participating Insurer. The Solicitors framework is the strictest in the UK.

Surveyors under RICS work to banded minimums by turnover: up to £100k turnover requires £250k; £100k-£200k requires £500k; over £200k requires £1m. RICS also requires defence costs in addition to the limit and runs an Assigned Risks Pool for firms that cannot get cover on the open market.

Engineers (ICE, IStructE, CIBSE) have no statutory minimum. Cover is driven by client contracts and professional guidance rather than a regulator floor.

Accountants under ICAEW work to limits based on fee income: 2.5× gross fee income, with a floor of £250k, for fees under £800k, and a flat £2m above that (ICAEW PII Regulations, from 1 September 2024). ACCA operates a similar graduated regime.

Where architects stand apart.

• The £250k expected minimum is materially below what most commercial architect work would actually expose. Most clients require £1m, £2m, or £5m by contract.
• Aggregate cover is explicitly permitted for the four named categories, unlike SRA solicitors where no aggregation is allowed.
• The post-Grenfell market squeeze hit architects PI harder than most other professions, with insurer withdrawals, capacity contraction, and significant rate increases over 2019-2023. Market conditions improved through 2024 and into 2025, but architects PI remains a specialist placement.

The practical consequence: architects PI is now a specialist placement that requires a broker who actively tracks insurer appetite and can present a practice in the right way to underwriters. Generic commercial brokers struggle with it.

Architects: where the PI requirement actually comes from

Architects are regulated by one body and represented by others, so it is worth being precise about where the professional indemnity requirement in this guide actually comes from.

Sources: ARB PII Guidance paras 2.2, 3.2, 4.2, 6.2 (arb.org.uk); RIBA Guide to Professional Indemnity Insurance 2024, quoting ARB Code Standard 4, and RIBA Code of Practice cl. 9.1–9.2 (riba.org). Cells marked “Not published” were not stated in the sources cited; they are not an assertion that no requirement exists.

The aggregate exceptions: cladding, fire safety, asbestos, pollution

The aggregate exceptions are one of the most important practical things to understand at renewal.

What "aggregate" means in this context. Instead of each separate claim attracting the full limit independently, all claims in a defined category share a single annual ceiling. For example, if your policy has a £1m aggregate for cladding claims, the total of all cladding-related claims notified in the policy year is limited to £1m, even if multiple separate claims emerge.

Why this matters. A practice that worked on multiple buildings with similar fire safety or cladding concerns could in theory face many parallel claims for the same systemic issue. Under each-and-every-claim, the insurer would have to pay the full limit per matter. Under aggregate, exposure is capped at a single limit. Insurers built this in to make the work writeable at all after post-Grenfell.

ARB's exact definitions (from the PII Guidance footnotes).

Fire Safety Claims means any damage, loss, cost or expense or any other liability directly or indirectly arising from or in any way related to the fire safety or fire performance or combustibility of a building or structure or any part of such building or structure.

Cladding Claims means any damage, loss, cost or expense or any other liability directly or indirectly arising from or in any way related to the combustibility of any composite panels, cladding or façades of buildings or structures, and/or internal or external wall systems and any associated core/filler/insulation material and/or any fixing systems.

Both definitions are very broad. "Directly or indirectly arising from or in any way related to" captures more than it might appear at first read. Wording variation between insurers is real, so the definitions in your specific policy matter.

Practical implications for your renewal.

1. Check the aggregate amount. If your policy has a £1m cladding aggregate but your practice has done substantial cladding-related work over the last decade, the aggregate is exposed if multiple claims emerge. Higher aggregate limits typically cost more premium but may be essential for firms with concentrated cladding exposure.
2. Check whether consequential losses are included. ARB's guidance accepts that aggregated cover "may be limited to direct losses arising from a negligent act", meaning consequential losses can be carved out. Wording check needed.
3. Check the excess on aggregate categories. Higher excesses for cladding-category claims are now common. Make sure you understand what you would actually pay before insurance attaches.
4. Re-test the market each year. ARB expects you to take reasonable steps at each renewal to see whether the aggregation or other restrictions can be removed. Keep a record of that exercise; if a regulatory question is asked later, you want evidence that you tried.
5. Never accept a complete exclusion for work you continue to do. ARB is firm: aggregation is acceptable as a last resort; a complete exclusion for ongoing work is not.

The Building Safety Act 2022: what changed

The Building Safety Act 2022 reshaped accountability for building safety and has direct implications for architects PI. Two areas matter most: extended limitation periods, and the dutyholder regime for higher-risk buildings.

Extended limitation periods. Section 135 of the Act inserted a new section 4B into the Limitation Act 1980, extending the time within which claims can be brought under the Defective Premises Act 1972 (DPA):

• For claims under section 1 DPA (defects in new dwellings) where the right of action accrued before 28 June 2022, the limitation period was extended retrospectively from 6 years to 30 years. This captures dwellings completed back to roughly mid-1992.
• For claims under section 1 DPA accruing on or after 28 June 2022, the period is 15 years prospectively.
• A new section 2A DPA was introduced, creating a cause of action for refurbishment and other works to existing dwellings, with a 15-year prospective limitation period.
• Section 38 of the Building Act 1984 (civil claim for breach of building regulations, applying to non-dwelling buildings) was brought into force, also with a 15-year prospective limitation period.

In URS Corporation Limited v BDW Trading Limited [2023] EWCA Civ 772, the Court of Appeal confirmed that the 30-year retrospective period applies even to claims already under way before the Act came into force. That decision was further considered by the Supreme Court in 2024-25 and the retrospective effect remains good law. The practical consequence is that architects can face fresh claims for buildings completed as far back as 1992.

Higher-Risk Buildings and the dutyholder regime. The Building Safety Act introduced a new dutyholder regime for the design and construction of Higher-Risk Buildings (HRBs), defined as buildings of at least 18 metres in height or at least 7 storeys, containing at least 2 residential units. The Building Regulations etc. (Amendment) (England) Regulations 2023 set out specific dutyholder roles: Client, Principal Designer, Principal Contractor, Designer, and Contractor.

Note that the Building Regulations Principal Designer (under the BSA dutyholder regime) is a separate role from the CDM 2015 Principal Designer. Architects may hold one, both, or neither on a given project, and underwriters increasingly ask which.

Note also that a separate "relevant building" test of 11 metres or 5+ storeys applies for the BSA's leaseholder protections and remediation order regime. The HRB threshold (18m / 7 storeys) and the relevant building threshold (11m / 5 storeys) are not the same.

Underwriting impact. Insurers now ask materially more detailed questions about HRB involvement and the scope of design responsibility. Documentation matters: practices that can clearly show contractual scope of involvement on past HRB projects (design responsibility split, formal handovers, gateway sign-offs) typically secure better terms than those whose records are less complete.

Practices with no HRB exposure have generally seen rate softening over the last 18 months. Practices with significant HRB exposure still face more detailed underwriting and sometimes specific exclusions or higher excesses on relevant claims.

Common claim types

The main categories of claim against UK architects.

Design defects

The largest single source of claims by frequency:

• drawing or specification errors producing a built defect (wrong materials, inadequate detailing, missed structural requirements);
• coordination failures between disciplines (services clashes, services routing missing from drawings);
• weather-tightness and water ingress (incorrect or missing detailing of weatherproofing);
• thermal performance (buildings that don't achieve specified U-values or air-tightness targets).

Cladding and external envelope

A category that grew dramatically after Grenfell:

• inadequate specification of cladding materials or systems;
• fire stopping errors in compartmentation;
• cavity barriers missing or wrongly placed;
• Approved Document B compliance, including buildings completed under then-compliant earlier guidance now flagged by remediation regimes;
• residential buildings over 18m: compliance with Regulation 7(2) Building Regulations (the ban on combustible materials in external walls) and the requirements of BS 9991.

Programming and cost

• programme overrun caused by design changes;
• cost overrun where the design exceeds the agreed budget;
• quality issues at completion that delay practical completion.

Planning and building regulations

• planning consent errors (missing conditions, incorrect descriptions);
• Building Regulations non-compliance, typically caught at completion or during regulatory remediation;
• listed building consent errors.

Party Wall Act matters

These come up occasionally (failure to serve appropriate notices under the Party Wall etc. Act 1996, boundary disputes from inaccurate surveys) but are usually low-value and a small minority of architects PI claims.

Statutory time limits that outlast a one-year PI policy

Limitation is the reason run-off matters to an architectural practice; the periods below can run long after the policy year this guide describes has ended.

Sources: Limitation Act 1980 ss.2, 5, 8, 14A, 14B (legislation.gov.uk); Building Safety Act 2022 s.135 (legislation.gov.uk). Legal time limits, not policy terms — a claims-made PI policy only responds if cover is in force when the claim is made.

What drives premium

Fee income. The primary rating factor for most small and mid-sized practices. Premium is typically expressed as a percentage of architect fee income. For larger practices and those with HRB exposure, work mix often dominates fee income as a rating factor.

Work mix. The most heavily-loaded categories:

• HRB and building-safety-related work;
• cladding-relevant work, including remediation;
• high-value commercial buildings;
• public sector work where claims tail risk is high.

More favourably rated:

• domestic residential extensions and refurbishments;
• heritage and listed building work with limited fire-safety exposure;
• interior fit-out without structural alteration.

Claims history. Insurers look back across multiple policy years (typically 5-10 years). Specific claims in the cladding or fire safety category attract more underwriting scrutiny than other claim types.

Practice size and structure. Sole practitioners face higher per-fee-income rates than mid-sized partnerships, all else equal, because of supervision and continuity risk.

Quality of submission. Insurers reward practices that submit clean, well-organised proposals with clear scope-of-work descriptions, fee income split, and documented quality management procedures.

Excess level. Higher excesses materially reduce premium for some risk categories, particularly for the aggregate exceptions like cladding.

Cover limit above £250k. Most practices buy materially above the ARB expected minimum. Client contracts typically demand £1m to £5m. Layers above the primary tend to cost less per million as the attachment point rises.

Sector concentration. Practices with a high concentration in a single sector (mostly residential, mostly schools, mostly NHS) sometimes attract different underwriting attention than diversified practices.

Collateral warranties: amendments that change your cover

Employers, developers and funders often ask for amendments to a standard-form collateral warranty that increase the architect’s exposure. Check each one against your PI policy before signing: the policy covers legal liability for a breach of professional duty, subject to its terms, and usually not obligations that go beyond reasonable skill and care.

Where an amendment goes beyond reasonable skill and care, the usual options are to resist it, to qualify it (“subject to the architect’s duty of reasonable skill and care”), or to accept the exposure knowing it may be uninsured.

Aggregation: when several claims share one limit

How a policy aggregates related claims decides how much cover is available when one design decision is repeated across several buildings. The illustration below assumes the same cladding detail was used on eight blocks for one developer.

This is illustrative: the outcome depends on the exact wording and the facts. ARB’s PII guidance allows fire safety and cladding cover to be written in the aggregate, which caps the total for those claims in a policy year whatever the aggregation wording says.

Reading your PI quote line by line

Read the endorsements and the wording before you look at the price. The quote summary tells you what the insurer is offering; the wording and its endorsements decide whether a claim is actually paid.

A typical architects PI quote has a summary page showing the insurer, policy period, limit, excess and retroactive date, then any inner limits or aggregate sections, subjectivities, endorsements, the premium with tax and any fee, and the policy wording, which is often sent separately. Work through it in this order.

Limit and basis. Check that the main limit is each and every claim, and that only the categories ARB allows to be aggregated (fire safety, cladding, asbestos and pollution) are written in the aggregate. Then check whether defence costs sit inside the limit or are paid on top of it.

Inner limits and aggregate sections. This is where architects quotes differ most. Look for separate figures for fire safety, cladding, asbestos and pollution, and for anything aimed at higher-risk buildings. Compare each one with last year's policy and with the work you actually do.

Excess. Confirm the standard excess, whether a higher excess applies to the aggregate categories, and whether the excess also bites on defence costs.

Retroactive date. Work done before this date is not covered. For an established practice it should usually go back to when the practice started. If it moves forward at renewal, often when you change insurer, your oldest projects can drop out of cover. With Defective Premises Act claims now running up to 30 years for older dwellings, that back catalogue matters.

Endorsements. Read every one. Watch for exclusions or sub-limits on cladding, fire safety, higher-risk buildings or asbestos, and for named projects carved out because they were flagged in your proposal. If an endorsement completely excludes work you still do, the quote does not meet ARB's expectations as it stands, so go back to your broker before accepting it.

Subjectivities. These are conditions you must meet before cover is binding, such as completing a fire safety questionnaire or confirming there have been no new claims since the proposal. Clear them in writing before the renewal date, not after.

In the wording itself, read the definitions (especially "Claim", "Circumstance" and "Professional Services"), the exclusions, the notification and claims conditions, and any separate section on fire safety, higher-risk buildings or collateral warranties.

Before you accept, ask four questions. Has any inner limit moved against you since last year? Has the retroactive date changed? Has any project been excluded by name? Which subjectivities are still open?

What to do when a claim or complaint lands

Notify first, then act through the proper channels. ARB's guidance expects you to tell insurers at the earliest opportunity about any circumstance likely to lead to a claim, and late notification is one of the most common ways architects compromise their cover.

In the first day

• Tell your broker straight away, even if you think the matter will come to nothing.
• Keep every document exactly as it is. Do not edit drawings, delete emails or tidy the project file.
• Tell the principal or whoever is responsible for risk in the practice.
• Note the key dates, such as completion, handover and whether the appointment was signed as a deed, so the limitation position can be worked out.

In the first week

• Your broker formally notifies the insurer. Your job is to supply the documents asked for, promptly and in full.
• Choose one person in the practice to be the point of contact.
• Acknowledge the client's letter, but do not respond on the legal points until the insurer, or the solicitors it appoints, has had a say.
• On larger matters, such as fire safety or higher-risk building claims, expect the insurer to appoint specialist construction solicitors. Their interests usually line up with yours, but they take instructions from the insurer.

What not to do

• Do not admit liability. Well-meant phrases such as "we should have caught that" can be used against you and may prejudice cover.
• Do not agree a settlement, a fee reduction or a goodwill payment without the insurer's consent. Policies usually make that consent a condition of cover.
• Do not redesign or remediate on your own initiative just to make the problem go away. Agree any remedial work with the insurer first.
• Do not play the matter down when you notify. An incomplete notification is a common cause of coverage disputes.

Notify circumstances, not just claims

You do not need a letter of claim before you notify. A client complaint, a building control concern, a fire safety review of a past building or an error you have found in your own drawings can all be notifiable circumstances. Because PI is written on a claims-made basis, a circumstance properly notified is usually attached to the policy in force at the time, subject to policy terms, even if the claim itself arrives years later.

While a claim is running, your broker argues your corner with the insurer and keeps the record straight for future renewals. The panel solicitor runs your legal defence. Keep those two roles separate.

Common myths and mistakes

Many coverage problems start with an assumption nobody checked. These are the ones that come up most often for architects.

"The ARB minimum is enough for us." £250,000 is a floor, not a recommendation. Standard 4 expects cover that is adequate and appropriate for your work, and most client appointments ask for considerably more.

"Fire safety is in our standard policy." It may be. It may also be capped at an aggregate figure, carry a higher excess or be excluded. Only the endorsement tells you which.

"We stopped that work, so the exclusion doesn't matter." PI is claims-made. An exclusion on this year's policy applies to claims made this year, including claims about projects you finished years ago.

"Run-off is someone else's problem." It is yours. ARB expects six years (five in Scotland) at the same level as your final year, and Defective Premises Act claims can run much longer. Plan for it well before you stop practising.

"A clean record means we need less cover." A good claims history helps on price. It does not change the size of the claim your largest project could produce.

"Notifying a circumstance will push up our premium." It might. Failing to notify something you knew about is far more damaging, because late notification gives the insurer grounds to dispute cover.

"Changing insurer means losing cover for old work." Not if the retroactive date is carried over. Check it on every quote.

"Net contribution clauses solve the problem." They help, but only if they appear in every relevant appointment and warranty, are properly drafted and are engaged by the claim. They are not a substitute for an adequate limit.

"The Building Safety Act only matters for high-rise work." The longer Defective Premises Act limitation periods apply to dwellings generally, not only to higher-risk buildings. Any practice with residential work in its past should treat them as relevant.

Choosing a broker for architects PI

Architects PI requires a broker who actively tracks insurer appetite in the post-Grenfell, post-Building Safety Act market. Generic commercial brokers struggle because:

• insurer appetite for architects PI has shifted materially since 2019 and continues to change annually;
• the aggregate exception structure requires reading wordings carefully (not all brokers do);
• the Building Safety Act has changed what insurers want to see in a submission;
• capacity for certain work types (high-rise cladding, HRBs) has been limited and the brokers who can access it have specific relationships.

The five things that matter.

1. Active market knowledge. Ask which insurers your broker has placed architects PI with in the last 12 months. The answer should be specific. If they can't name insurers, they are not active in the segment.
2. Broad insurer access. A broker tied to one or two insurers cannot deliver the best terms across the market. Confirm they have access to the major architects PI insurers and aren't routing every quote through a single carrier.
3. FCA authorisation. Verifiable on the FCA Register at register.fca.org.uk. Apex Insurance Brokers Limited is FCA-authorised under FRN 724952.
4. Reads wordings, not just quotes. Aggregate exceptions, run-off mechanics, and HRB-related exclusions are hidden in wording detail. A broker who only summarises the quote letter misses material differences between insurers.
5. Claims advocacy. Architects PI claims often run for years. A broker who handles the claim notification in the right form, advocates on coverage decisions, and stands between the practice and the loss adjuster delivers material value when a claim crystallises.

Renewal: what to do and when

Architects PI renewal dates were historically clustered around 1 April and 1 October because of where major insurers ran their renewal cycles. Today, renewal dates are spread throughout the year and most practices renew on the anniversary of when the firm first incepted cover.

Whatever your renewal date, the principle holds: start preparation 60-90 days before renewal. For HRB-exposed practices, push that to 90-120 days because the submission is materially more involved.

A complete renewal submission typically includes:

• updated fee income by sector and work type;
• number of registered architects and other fee-earners;
• material changes in the practice over the last year (new partners, new offices, new work types, regulatory matters);
• claims experience for the look-back period;
• any circumstances notified, with status updates;
• HRB exposure summary: buildings worked on, role, contractual scope;
• cladding and fire safety exposure summary;
• quality management procedures: appointment scrutiny, design review, file management.

The cleaner the submission, the better the terms. Insurers price uncertainty into premium; a clear submission removes uncertainty.

Apex's commercial proposal portal at proposal.apexinsurancebrokers.co.uk accepts uploaded Statements of Fact and existing schedules, with a note on what has changed since last renewal.

Special situations

Sole practitioners

Sole practitioners face structural pressures: no supervision redundancy, concentration of claim history, and succession risk. Sole practitioner premiums are typically positioned higher than partnership-sized practices on a per-fee-income basis.

Sole practitioners considering retirement need to plan run-off cover well in advance. The cost is typically 2× to 3× the final annual premium for the full six-year period, payable as a single non-cancellable premium on cessation.

Mergers and acquisitions

When practices merge, the surviving practice typically inherits the predecessor's claims tail. Underwriting at the next renewal will rate the combined firm's claims history. Practices should disclose the full PI history of both firms during the merger process and factor any premium step-change into the deal economics.

Closure and run-off

Closing a practice triggers the run-off obligation. The cover must:

• be in place on the date the practice ceases;
• meet the £250k expected minimum (or higher if your final year of cover was higher; ARB expects run-off at the same level as the final year);
• be maintained for six years (five in Scotland);
• in practice, be written as a non-cancellable single-premium policy.

Practical guidance.

• Cost. Typically 2× to 3× the final annual premium for the full six-year period, paid upfront as a single premium.
• Timing. The cover must be in place on cessation. There is no grace period.
• Choice of insurer. Run-off is generally placed with the incumbent insurer, though in some circumstances a different insurer may write it.
• Consider longer run-off. ARB requires six years but the Defective Premises Act now runs to 15 years prospective (30 years for historical claims). Six years discharges the ARB obligation but does not eliminate the residual exposure. Principals should consider whether longer cover is commercially appropriate.

Practices with HRB or cladding exposure

These require specialist placement. A broker actively trading in the cladding-aware insurer panel can identify which carriers are appetite-positive for your specific exposure. Some firms find that splitting cover, with a primary policy on the main work and a separate placement for HRB-specific work, produces better terms than a single composite policy.

Architects practising through limited companies

The insurance attaches to the entity providing the services. The named insured should be the practice (whether limited company, LLP, or partnership), with cover extending to all partners, directors, and employees who are registered architects, and to staff acting on behalf of the practice.

About Apex Insurance Brokers

Apex Insurance Brokers Limited is a Bristol-based, FCA-authorised commercial insurance broker (FRN 724952, Companies House 07014570) specialising in professional indemnity insurance for regulated professions.

We have access to the relevant PI insurer market: we place cover with the market for architects PI and place cover with whichever insurer offers the best terms for your practice's specific position each year. We do not have ties to any particular insurer.

Each client has a named broker. We conduct a fair and personal analysis of the market on each renewal and we act as your broker, on your behalf, in dealings with insurers and on claims.

Trading address. 53 Queen Charlotte Street, Bristol, BS1 4HQ.
Telephone. 0117 325 0027.
Email. info@apexinsurancebrokers.co.uk.
Quote portal (commercial). proposal.apexinsurancebrokers.co.uk

The terms on which we act are set out in our Terms of Business, and the route to raising any concerns is on our Complaints page.